Re: Joining the Internal Meetings

Correction-  read *what meeting*'??
Luca, Josh and others in cc. As requested, please introduce yourselves
and share publicly any work in relation to the CG. No secret society in
this CG :-)


On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:04 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Greetings, Carl and everyone
> Thanks for sharing- What meaning    *meeting*?
>
> @Carl: May I suggest that as a co-chair you inform members of private
> meetings that you may be invited to? The list nor myself were never invited
> (unless it was an internal meeting from another CG)
>
>  Who is Luca (we never heard from him on the list or otherwise)
> A secret society in the making :-)??
>
> Luca, please introduce yourself and share you agenda and meeting minutes
> publicly please
> and when you do so make sure that you give enough advance notice and
> timezone flexibility for members to join
> or follow up?
>
> Look forward to learn more about your involvement with AI KR, as
> previously solicited
>
> Best
> Paola Di Maio, Chair
>
> All meetings of this CG are public and announced on this list
>
> If there has been a meeting, it was organized without the AI KR CG Chair
> or member knowledge
> and it is not to be considered an internal meeting. Anyone wishing to
> organise a meeing, are welcome to do so, provided they announce it to the
> list giving the opportunity for members to join
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:57 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As stated at meeting - I was attempting to catch-up on the CG's progress.
>> My broader interest is related to understanding Web of Things needs as
>> part of a Safeguard Framework for AI KR (Artificial Intelligence
>> Knowledge Representation)
>>
>> Carl Mattocks
>>
>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:57 AM Luca Barbato <luca.barbato@luminem.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/10/23 13:45, Korkan, Ege wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > Together with Cris, we wanted to ask a rather blunt but important
>>> > question. While we are trying to involve more people with the inner
>>> > workings of the CG, we should understand why you want to be involved
>>> > with it. So very simply and bluntly, why did you join the Internal
>>> > Meeting last week, what were you expecting?
>>> >
>>>
>>> In my case I wanted to see who's coming and I was looking forward to see
>>> if we could gather different communities to exchange ideas and solutions.
>>>
>>> Hopefully I'll have more time in the next months and try to gather ideas
>>> on how to get enough companies to share a works-with-wot theme since the
>>> adoption in certain fields is lagging because we need to have enough
>>> devices proving that our standard solves real problems.
>>>
>>> lu
>>>
>>