Greetings, Carl and everyone
Thanks for sharing- What meaning?
May I suggest that as a co-chair you inform members of private meetings
that you may be invited to? The list nor myself were never invited (unless
it was an internal meeting from another CG)
Who is Luca (we never heard from him on the list or otherwise)
A secret society in the making :-)??
Luca, please introduce yourself and share you agenda and meeting minutes
publicly please
and when you do so make sure that you give enough advance notice and
timezone flexibility for members to join
or follow up?
Look forward to learn more about your involvement with AI KR, as previously
solicited
Best
Paola Di Maio, Chair
All meetings of this CG are public and announced on this list
If there has been a meeting, it was organized without the AI KR CG Chair or
member knowledge
and it is not to be considered an internal meeting. Anyone wishing to
organise a meeing, are welcome to do so, provided they announce it to the
list giving the opportunity for members to join
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 2:57 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As stated at meeting - I was attempting to catch-up on the CG's progress.
> My broader interest is related to understanding Web of Things needs as
> part of a Safeguard Framework for AI KR (Artificial Intelligence
> Knowledge Representation)
>
> Carl Mattocks
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:57 AM Luca Barbato <luca.barbato@luminem.it>
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/23 13:45, Korkan, Ege wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Together with Cris, we wanted to ask a rather blunt but important
>> > question. While we are trying to involve more people with the inner
>> > workings of the CG, we should understand why you want to be involved
>> > with it. So very simply and bluntly, why did you join the Internal
>> > Meeting last week, what were you expecting?
>> >
>>
>> In my case I wanted to see who's coming and I was looking forward to see
>> if we could gather different communities to exchange ideas and solutions.
>>
>> Hopefully I'll have more time in the next months and try to gather ideas
>> on how to get enough companies to share a works-with-wot theme since the
>> adoption in certain fields is lagging because we need to have enough
>> devices proving that our standard solves real problems.
>>
>> lu
>>
>