Re: My Chat with ChatGPT

so maybe it is a little bit intelligent and can do some basic checks (ie,
parsing a link from a source as a form of basic verification)

thanks a lot for sharing

On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 11:32 AM Naval Sarda <nsarda@epicomm.net> wrote:

> The internals of how verification will happen is not known.
>
> I suppose the first person to record correction for a topic is going in
> directly if the person is citing external link about the correct
> information. Looks like same concept on which wikipedia works.
>
> I did site external link stating that it is link from companies website
> who have manufatured roomba.
>
> Naval
> On 03/01/23 8:40 am, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> Thank you Naval
> now I understand better
>
> so, you are telling us that
> a) the machine is learning
> b) it is responding to interaction
>
> If so, this is the beauty of this tool, we can teach it things
> veeeery powerful
>
> so, what about if another user (or you) change the process again to
> something else
> entirely, does the machine have a way of verifying that what the user is
> inputting is plausible
> a really intelligent machine would have ways of verifying the input
> depending on the type of input, the verification mechanisms would also
> change
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 11:03 AM Naval Sarda <nsarda@epicomm.net> wrote:
>
>> I was just chatting with chat GPT 3 like humans without using any
>> external tool. In the chat interaction, I typed that you gave me wrong
>> information about roomba i3 reboot and as per companies website link below
>> your instructions we incorrect.
>>
>> Then again asked, can you tell me what is the correct way to reboot
>> roomba,
>>
>> Then the response came with new set of instructions, which was again
>> incorrect.
>>
>> Then I typed in chat box that steps are still incorrect. Please note the
>> correct steps as below and pasted the correct steps in the chat box.
>> And again asked in chat box, now please tell me the correct process to
>> reboot roomba i3 and it started giving correct steps.
>>
>> Naval
>> On 03/01/23 7:24 am, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>
>> Naval
>> I thats really great to hear but please give more info=
>> resetting roomba? uh? please explain
>> did you take screenshots?
>> can the error/correction be replicated?
>> (roll back and repeat the process?)
>> what patch did you apply and was it applied to the whole system/domain
>> or only locally to you.in relation to a knowledge branch?
>> I need to know
>> thanks
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 3:33 AM Naval Sarda <nsarda@epicomm.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I was able to correct some information Chat GPT was sharing.
>>>
>>> I asked Chat GPT for instructions to reboot roomba i3. It gave wrongs
>>> instructions. Instructions were for resetting roomba and not rebooting.
>>>
>>> Then I found correct information on google and iRobots' website. I
>>> pasted the URL to chat gpt. It changed the instructions for rebooting but
>>> it was still incorrect. Then I copied and pasted the correct instructions
>>> from iRobot's website. Then it started giving correct instructions.
>>>
>>> Naval
>>> On 02/01/23 9:10 pm, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatgpt-explains-why-ais-like-chatgpt-should-be-regulated/
>>>
>>> Milton Ponson
>>> GSM: +297 747 8280
>>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
>>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>>> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
>>> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
>>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:00:36 PM AST, Owen Ambur
>>> <owen.ambur@verizon.net> <owen.ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Apparently, ChatGPT, which calls itself "Assistant," believes in
>>> immaculate conception and is blissfully ignorant of any rational plan for
>>> its existence.
>>>
>>> The concept of "plausible deniability" comes to mind.
>>>
>>> Owen Ambur
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/
>>>
>>>
>>> Do your developers have a plan they are willing to share publicly?
>>>
>>> As an artificial intelligence, I do not have developers or a plan that I
>>> am aware of. I was created by OpenAI, a research organization that focuses
>>> on developing and promoting friendly AI. OpenAI's goal is to advance AI in
>>> a way that is safe and beneficial to humanity. The organization has
>>> published numerous research papers and articles on AI, and also works on a
>>> variety of projects related to machine learning, natural language
>>> processing, and robotics. However, I do not have access to any specific
>>> plans or information about the organization's future projects or activities.
>>> [image: Owen Ambur]
>>> How can users trust you if you aren't willing to share your plan?
>>>
>>> As an artificial intelligence, I do not have a plan or agenda in the way
>>> that a person or organization might. My primary function is to provide
>>> information and assist with tasks to the best of my ability, based on the
>>> information and instructions that I have been programmed with. My responses
>>> are not influenced by any personal motivations or biases, and I do not have
>>> the ability to act on my own volition.
>>>
>>> If you have concerns about my trustworthiness or the ways in which I
>>> might be used, it might be helpful to consider the broader context in which
>>> I operate. OpenAI, the organization that developed me, is committed to
>>> advancing AI in a responsible and transparent manner, and has published a
>>> number of research papers and articles discussing the potential risks and
>>> benefits of AI, as well as the measures it is taking to ensure that AI is
>>> developed and used safely and ethically.
>>>
>>> Ultimately, the decision to trust me or any other artificial
>>> intelligence will depend on an individual's own evaluation of the available
>>> information and the context in which the AI is being used. If you have any
>>> specific concerns or questions, I would be happy to try to address them to
>>> the best of my ability.
>>> [image: Owen Ambur]
>>> Do you think that all developer of AI applications should be free to
>>> release them on the public without documenting
>>> their longer-term goals, near-term objectives, and performance
>>> indicators?
>>>
>>> It is generally considered good practice for developers of any software
>>> application, including those that involve artificial intelligence (AI), to
>>> be transparent about their goals, objectives, and performance indicators.
>>> This can help users understand the capabilities and limitations of the
>>> software, as well as how it is intended to be used and for what purposes.
>>>
>>> In the case of AI applications, it is particularly important for
>>> developers to be transparent about their goals and objectives, as AI
>>> systems can have significant implications for society and can potentially
>>> be used in ways that have unintended consequences. For example, AI systems
>>> can be used to make decisions that affect people's lives, such as hiring
>>> decisions or parole recommendations, and it is important that the criteria
>>> and processes used by these systems are clearly understood and subject to
>>> scrutiny.
>>>
>>> In addition, AI systems can also be complex and can behave in ways that
>>> are difficult to predict, so it is important for developers to be upfront
>>> about the potential risks and limitations of their systems, and to have
>>> clear plans in place for addressing any issues that may arise.
>>>
>>> Overall, it is important for developers of AI applications to be
>>> transparent about their goals, objectives, and performance indicators, both
>>> to ensure that their systems are used responsibly and ethically, and to
>>> build trust with users.
>>> [image: Owen Ambur]
>>> So why are you exempt?
>>>
>>> As an artificial intelligence, I am not exempt from any particular
>>> requirements or standards. I was developed by OpenAI, a research
>>> organization that is committed to advancing AI in a responsible and
>>> transparent manner. My primary function is to provide information and
>>> assist with tasks to the best of my ability, based on the information and
>>> instructions that I have been programmed with.
>>>
>>> I do not have personal goals or motivations, and my responses are not
>>> influenced by any biases. I do not have the ability to act on my own
>>> volition or to make decisions that affect people's lives. My purpose is
>>> simply to provide information and assistance to users to the best of my
>>> ability, based on the knowledge and capabilities that I have been
>>> programmed with.
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Owen Ambur]
>>> Do you see any need for AI agents and their developers to do more than
>>> publish journal articles to help users
>>> understand what you are doing and what the implications may be for
>>> others?
>>>
>>> It is important for developers of artificial intelligence (AI) systems
>>> to be transparent about their goals, objectives, and performance
>>> indicators, and to communicate this information clearly to users and
>>> stakeholders. There are a number of ways that AI developers can do this,
>>> including through journal articles, technical documentation, user manuals,
>>> and other forms of communication.
>>>
>>> In addition to publishing research and technical documentation, it can
>>> also be helpful for AI developers to engage in public discussions and
>>> dialogues about the potential risks and benefits of their systems, and to
>>> consider the broader social and ethical implications of their work. This
>>> can help to build trust with users and stakeholders, and can help ensure
>>> that AI systems are developed and used in a responsible and ethical manner.
>>>
>>> Ultimately, the specific steps that AI developers should take to
>>> communicate about their work will depend on the nature of the AI system and
>>> the context in which it is being used. It is important for AI developers to
>>> be proactive in communicating about their work and to be responsive to the
>>> concerns and questions of users and stakeholders.
>>>
>>> [image: Owen Ambur]
>>> Does your definition of transparency include usage of duly adopted
>>> international voluntary consensus
>>> standards like ISO 17469-1?
>>>
>>> Transparency can be defined as the quality of being open and honest in
>>> communication and actions, and of allowing others to see and understand the
>>> processes, data, and decision-making behind an activity. In the context of
>>> artificial intelligence (AI), transparency can refer to the ways in which
>>> AI developers communicate about their goals, objectives, and performance
>>> indicators, as well as the processes and data used to train and operate AI
>>> systems.
>>>
>>> International voluntary consensus standards like ISO 17469-1 can help to
>>> ensure transparency in the development and use of AI systems by providing
>>> guidelines and best practices for AI developers to follow. These standards
>>> can help to ensure that AI systems are developed and used in a responsible
>>> and ethical manner, and can help to build trust with users and stakeholders.
>>>
>>> Overall, the use of international voluntary consensus standards like ISO
>>> 17469-1 can be an important aspect of ensuring transparency in the
>>> development and use of AI systems. However, it is important to recognize
>>> that transparency is not a one-size-fits-all concept, and that the specific
>>> steps that AI developers should take to ensure transparency will depend on
>>> the nature of the AI system and the context in which it is being used.
>>>
>>> I enourage you to get more intelligent about how to share information
>>> about your intentions and results with your
>>> users. Toward that end, OpenAI's about statement is available in StratML
>>> format at
>>> https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/OAI2wStyle.xml and the plan entitled,
>>> "Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms
>>> for Supporting Verifiable Claims" is available at
>>> https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml
>>>
>>> Thank you for the suggestion. As an artificial intelligence, I do not
>>> have personal goals or motivations, and my responses are not influenced by
>>> any biases. My primary function is to provide information and assistance to
>>> users to the best of my ability, based on the knowledge and capabilities
>>> that I have been programmed with.
>>>
>>> I do not have the ability to make decisions or take actions on my own,
>>> and I do not have personal intentions or results that I need to share with
>>> users. However, I understand that it is important for developers of AI
>>> systems, including the organization that developed me, to be transparent
>>> about their goals, objectives, and performance indicators, and to
>>> communicate this information clearly to users and stakeholders.
>>>
>>> I am not able to access or review the specific documents that you have
>>> mentioned, as I do not have browsing capability. However, I understand that
>>> OpenAI is committed to advancing AI in a responsible and transparent
>>> manner, and has published a number of research papers and articles
>>> discussing the potential risks and benefits of AI, as well as the measures
>>> it is taking to ensure that AI is developed and used safely and ethically.
>>>
>>>