- From: Peter Rivett <pete.rivett@federatedknowledge.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:27:04 +0000
- To: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- CC: "Stanislav Srednyak, Ph.D." <stanislav.srednyak@duke.edu>
- Message-ID: <BY5PR14MB39215E3ED844F7B2305BDAAC810A9@BY5PR14MB3921.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Carl, I don't know if it's a copy-and-paste error but I don't see how the title "KR for Human in the Loop" matches the objective which is about the somewhat legacy XML language StratML; which AFAIK is for strategic performance planning as opposed to AI, human involvement in AI, or knowledge representation except for the very narrow domain of knowledge of strategic plans. Apologies for missing background from previous pre-COVID discussions, but I'm sure I won't be the only one: are there any archives or outputs? Maybe an explanation of the specific problem space related to Human in the Loop Knowledge Representation would help: for example the competency questions it's hoped to address. Regards Pete Pete Rivett (pete.rivett@federatedknowledge.com) Federated Knowledge, LLC (LEI 98450013F6D4AFE18E67) Schedule a meeting at https://calendly.com/rivettp ________________________________ From: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 10:29 AM To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>; W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org> Cc: Stanislav Srednyak, Ph.D. <stanislav.srednyak@duke.edu> Subject: KR for Human in the Loop": Two challenges related to KR.. KR Folk To Give a measure of Thanks at this time of Thanks Giving .. I invite members to show their level of interest in participating in a regular conference call to discuss "KR for Human in the Loop" Objective is to continue defining how "StratML" helps explain AI KR. Specifically, before Covid, we had mapped out how "Human in Loop" was a significant factor in shaping use of AI KR .. But we had no "language" for that interaction. Cheers Carl Mattocks CarlMattocks@WellnessIntelligence.Institute It was a pleasure to clarify On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:05 AM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org<mailto:dsr@w3.org>> wrote: If you want an natural language notation for math, you might be interested in EasyMath from work in the late nineties: EzMath provides an easy to learn notation for embedding mathematical expressions in Web pages. The notation is inspired by how expressions are spoken aloud together with a few abbreviations for conciseness (e.g. x^y denotes x raised to the power y). See: https://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/EzMath/ https://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/EzMath/EzMathPaper.html Sadly, the browser plugin is now defunct as it relies on an interface long abandoned by modern browsers. It wouldn’t be that hard (one week's work) to reimplement it as a JavaScript library using the HTML CANVAS element as its target. However, that is a million miles from work on AI agents like Minerva. Minerva is a sophisticated deep learning based system. It starts from general purpose large language model (PaLM) and refines it with training against a mathematical dataset, producing impressive results. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.14858.pdf However, the approach described in the paper (linked above) is limited to agents with a single purpose. For agents designed for general purposes, we need a more flexible approach. That is why I am proposing work on direct manipulation of latent semantics, along with mimicking the way that the brain separates different kinds of knowledge across different parts of the cortex. The idea is to combine intuitive (System 1) thinking with deliberative, analytic thinking (System 2). Minerva only supports the former. On 21 Nov 2022, at 10:00, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com<mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>> wrote: You and I are on different planets, and speak different languages :-) So it seems. :-) Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org<mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
Received on Monday, 21 November 2022 20:27:20 UTC