Re: AI KR glossary - concepts and nomenclature

Owen
thanks-

 stratML can be generally useful and it is obviously important to you, but
somehow it seems to limit your vision, and consequently your input and
contributions only to what can be related to statml
*(ad nauseam?)*

*I wonder i you may be able to see beyond stratml, this CG is not about
stratML per se*

In relation to AI KR, picture loosely a domain like this image below
*also not completely covering the domain


[image: image.png]

Source:
http://xbrlsite.azurewebsites.net/2019/Library/ReasoningCapacity.jpg

More specifically, questions such as
How can AI KR techniques address challenges such as
 lack of logical integrity in autonomous systems and others

The purpose of the list is to maintain a set of concepts and nomenclature
that represents the domain
AI KR, and help to answer the questions
* what is KR (pointer to the list concepts and terminology)*
*and how can we leverage AI KR techniques to solve current challenges*

Etc,




On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:08 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> Paola, I don't yet understand the value of such a listing of terms
> relevant to knowledge representation and reasoning, as per Brachman &
> Leveque's book
> <https://www.amazon.com/Knowledge-Representation-Reasoning-Artificial-Intelligence/dp/1558609326>.
> However, among those you have copied in your spreadsheet, these *seem* to
> be related to the StratML standard:
>
>
>    1. Abstraction space for planning, 320
>    2. Add list for planning, 313
>    3. Belief, 3
>    4. Belief measure, 252
>    5. Belief network, 246
>    6. Belief revision, 285
>    7. conclusion supported, 189
>    8. Conditional planner, 321
>    9. Conflict resolution strategy, 126
>    10. Delete list for planning, 313
>    11. Effect of an action, 287
>    12. focus, 191
>    13. goal-directed, 117
>    14. Goal-directed reasoning, 117
>    15. goal regression, 315
>    16. Goal tree, 90
>    17. Hypothesis, 6
>    18. individual, 136
>    19. network, 188
>    20. Nonlinear plan, 317
>    21. objective, 239
>    22. Objective probability, 239
>    23. Objective sentence, 230
>    24. operator, 313
>    25. operators, 312
>    26. PLANNER , 111
>    27. Planning abstraction space, 320
>    28. Planning operators, 312
>    29. plausibility measure, 252
>    30. Preemption strategy, 195
>    31. Probability measure, 240
>    32. Progressive planner, 314
>    33. Quantifier, 16
>    34. Regressive planner, 315
>    35. role, 157
>    36. satisfaction of, 22
>    37. set of support strategy, 73
>    38. strategy, 73
>    39. Unit preference strategy, 73
>    40. World model in planning, 312
>
> It would be helpful to me to see the role (purpose) each of these concepts
> play in a plan for knowledge representation and reasoning.  At least it
> would be good to know how each of them is defined, if not also to see how
> they relate to each other.
>
> For example, in the context of the StratML standard, each Goal
> <https://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216_xsd.htm#Goal>
> may have one or more subordinate Objectives
> <https://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216_xsd.htm#Objective>.
> Each "operator" (Stakeholder
> <https://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216_xsd.htm#Stakeholder>
> of the performer type) may have one or more Roles
> <https://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216_xsd.htm#Role>
> of the Beneficiary or Performer type
> <https://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216_xsd.htm#RoleType>,
> and "Individual" (Person) is one of three Stakeholder types, along with
> "Organization" and "Generic_Group".
>
> Will look forward to learning what may come of this.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On 5/25/2022 12:08 AM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>
> anyone still maintaining lists of things?
> I do, more or less explicitly
>
> I have created a spreadsheet (cc by) initially using terms extracted from
> one of the textbooks in use
> as a a starting point  to compile a glossary
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IYpNOeRrRSMSmIMOPtwCQA0GRk2dbaMC2sk7BNK10I4/edit?usp=sharing
>
> QUIZ
> (please share with your colleagues and students)
> which  concepts are missing from the spreadsheet?
>
> In the spreadsheet, there is a link to another xls
> (I presume we could make it a tab o the first s/s  later)
> with novel  terms added by this AI KR CG members
> identified from other sources
> I have added a couple new terms  but there are many more that I can think o
> Perhaps others may like to have a go
>
> An up to date list of AI KR  concepts could be valuable and easy
> contribution in the public domain that in theory can be maintained by
> future generations (I do not think there is any such list available )
>
>
>
>
>
>
>