- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 14:51:52 +0800
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SrMUmYSCJwq4GRWe3HaxHsoK3v+vJtOQ8DXPydNuDpDFg@mail.gmail.com>
s since mentioning perfect knowledge is not illegal (after all, it has been a topic of interest rom philosophy to computer science)let me point to a parallel rich vein with some more readings going through the literature I found the topic Logical Omniscience (somewhat) This article, open access courtesy o Springer The Fundamental Problem of Logical Omniscience Peter Hawke1,2 · Ayb ̈uke ̈Ozg ̈un 1,2 · Francesco Berto 1,2 Received: 19 June 2019 / Accepted: 12 November 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract We propose a solution to the problem of logical omniscience in what we take to be its fundamental version: as concerning arbitrary agents and the knowledge attitude per se. Our logic of knowledge is a spin-off from a general theory of thick con- tent, whereby the content of a sentence has two components: (i) an intension, taking care of truth conditions; and (ii) a topic, taking care of subject matter. We present a list of plausible logical validities and invalidities for the logic of knowledge per se for arbitrary agents, and isolate three explanatory factors for them: (1) the topic- sensitivity of content; (2) the fragmentation of knowledge states; (3) the defeasibility of knowledge acquisition. We then present a novel dynamic epistemic logic that yields precisely the desired validities and invalidities, for which we provide expres- sivity and completeness results. We contrast this with related systems and address possible objections. Keywords Aboutness · Subject matter · Logical omniscience · Dynamic epistemic logic · https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10992-019-09536-6.pdf
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2022 06:52:42 UTC