- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 13:37:56 +0800
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SoLSBB1NjF5=YtTSv__nOcBWuqjqnbNLzZhyjXRjoWcGw@mail.gmail.com>
Owen, I have had some realization that leads me to reconsider Sharing goals and strategies works in cooperative environments, while much of the world we live in is adversarial, in some cases, viciously so When we expose our goals and strategies, it turns out someone out there may have made their goals and strategy to outsmart you, and you are providing them the means for the to do so I never thought this would be possible, I never thought someone would make their sole goal in life to prove me wrong, but looking back I suspect it has happened, and still happens today The more I am hones and open, the more someone leads me into exploiting these feautures to achieve their goal which is to prevent me from achieving my goals . It took me a lifetime to figure out. So let me think again :-) Lets share our goals and strategies only within certain boundaries, and in the meantime I think keeping our personal goals closely guarded in our hearts works best, although surely someone may try to steal them as well :-) Let me think PDM On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 6:22 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > Paola, while "adequacy" depends upon subjective judgment, it seems to me > that documenting human goals in open, standard, machine-readable format > might be a good step along the way toward deciding where we'd like to go > next. > > Conversely, it seems to me that failing to do so leaves us hung up in a > pointless Do Loop. > > Owen > > On 1/26/2021 10:57 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: > > when it comes to stratml, is it adequate to represent human goals? >
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2021 05:38:48 UTC