Re: no frames?/maybe a visual synopsis

I will provide references, and try to put some things into a general perspective. In a week I should be able to do this.

Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Tuesday, February 16, 2021, 8:05:41 PM AST, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Thanks,
yes, I d start from the broadest def for graph then disambiguate, it gives a deeper and clearer understanding imho

Exciting new research in neuroscience shows that cognitive processes in the brain and more specifically consciousness mirror quantum processes and that knowledge representation in the sense of quantum computing better describes and more closely resembles the functioning of our cognitive processes and consciousness.

a reference pls 

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:13 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:

The broadest definition of graph hails from category theory, which is now also used to model quantum physics, and any models for (high energy) physics, (bio)chemistry, genomics, neuroscience, nano scale technologies in materials science and engineering, quantum computing circuits etc.

And the category theory graphs can be used for both causal and non causal representations. So in a sense the definition given by Dave is a SPECIAL case.
Exciting new research in neuroscience shows that cognitive processes in the brain and more specifically consciousness mirror quantum processes and that knowledge representation in the sense of quantum computing better describes and more closely resembles the functioning of our cognitive processes and consciousness.
Thus graphs in quantum computing are probably better suited for formalizing knowledge representation than current computer science.

Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Monday, February 15, 2021, 6:20:30 AM AST, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:  
 
 I appreciate the many definitions for knowledge graph, but for me, a simpler and more appealing definition is:

A knowledge graph is a network of concepts and properties that can be used to represent both data and data models.

That is broad enough to cover a broad range of techniques including RDF, Property Graphs and Chunks.  It also avoids limiting knowledge graphs to graphs with formal semantics. Dictionary definitions of “knowledge” include:

a) the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association
b) acquaintance with or understanding of a science, art, or technique
c) the fact or condition of being aware of something


d) the range of one's information or understanding
e) the sum of what is known : the body of truth, information, and principles acquired by humankind

Which seems pretty good to me.  Knowledge needs to be good enough to guide actions rather than having to be formally correct. Scientific theories are judged to be useful if their predictions agree with experimental observations.


On 15 Feb 2021, at 00:58, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:I ll add this to the reader for KGA Common Sense View of Knowledge Graphshttps://www.mkbergman.com/2244/a-common-sense-view-of-knowledge-graphs/

Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things