- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 17:47:04 +0800
- To: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Cc: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SoxJt=cjqjDHVgaZ16BR+MfkCM+v68Ph+v=6MTCHQ9BiA@mail.gmail.com>
Milton afaik, there is not proposal yet other than in the subject line of this thread startd by Carl 29 Oct - I read the email as the intention to propose a stratml based registry, which I dont think can be viably maintained by this CG, however, this CG could come up with a stratml based schema/model that can be used by stakeholders who intend to maintain a register we would need to study some of the current implementation/pilots and maybe extend stratml accordingly, based on a very ballpark assessment since we assume that stratml is FOL compatible (dont think its an overstatement>) it should be easily translatable to any other model or xml or rule language language of choice <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 3:06 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > Paola and Carl, > > I am trying to find the emails detailing the mentioned proposal for a > Register of AI Systems in this mail list. I may have missed it in the > period i was offline and absent from the AIKR CG. > > Can you send me the info? > > I have been playing with an idea for a global Register for IT Governance > and Data Protection for all companies worldwide that use online data > collection through their online services, platforms and applications > downloaded onto digital devices or running in smart digital environments > (Smart building automation, the Internet of Things, smart vehicles etc.). > > I was prompted to play with this idea by the General Data Protection > Regulation of the European Union, the 2013 movie Terms and Condition May > Apply by Cullen Hoback (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzDgBITDaRY), and > the now very invasive use of AI algorithms to tweak user profiles. > > Such a register would provide industry, regulators, consumers and academia > with information on how companies comply with data protection regulations, > how they use AI, algorithms and IT in general in terms of corporate and > social governance. > > The register would be controlled by an Open Access International > Consortium of international regulatory bodies, internet organizations, > industry and academic research stakeholder organizations, and of course > international governance organizations for digital rights and privacy. > > RAIS could be embedded into this system. > > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Thursday, October 29, 2020, 9:48:55 AM ADT, carl mattocks < > carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The core of our proposal for the Register of AI Systems (RAIS) would > leverage the insights gained using StratML for AI KR. > > Simply put, core elements of RAIS include those used to explain Strategy, > value chain, objectives, goals, KR utilization and KPIs that measure > output / outcome. > > cheers > Carl > > It was a pleasure to clarify > > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 9:04 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thank you Carl > Yesterday a report was published on this theme > https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org/ > > Both Governance and explainability are open issues > If you couLD put together a concrete proposal, we can send it out as a WG > > But we need to discuss it, I am not sure a registry would cover all the > instances > and it would be an administrative overhead. > > Shall we open a draft and discuss some possibilities? > PDM > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:38 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Executive summary Mind the gap: How to fill the equality and AI > accountability gap in an automated world Institute for the Future of Work > Governance and regulation We need a new approach to governance and > regulation of data-driven, machine-based decision making. This approach > must be principle-driven and human-centred, work across the entire > innovation cycle, shift our emphasis to preventative action, and align our > legal regimes and regulators. ... > > https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5f57d40eb1c2ef22d8a8ca7e/5f9850d5410374c05fdc9a84_IFOW-ETF-Report-(v7-27.10.20).pdf > > .. the Institute for the Future of Work established a cross-disciplinary > Equality Task Force (ETF) to examine how algorithms and artificial > intelligence impact equality and fairness at work > > .. encourage systematic mapping of deployment and register of systems > involving some uses of algorithmic AI and ML systems to inform the public > and policy-making debates, ... > > enjoy > > Carl Mattocks > co-chair AIKRCG > > > > It was a pleasure to clarify > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Received on Saturday, 31 October 2020 09:47:55 UTC