Re: proposal .. register of systems involving some uses of algorithmic AI and ML

of course, we could come up with a model using stratml, validate it with a
few cases
and publish it as a spec
and let others (the stakeholders) adopt it and maintain the register
that should be within our capability

i think however may have to extend stratml with a few additional elements

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 9:03 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I dont see a problem with that, if that is enough to serve the purpose
>
> but  unless you or Owen are going to JAND curate and maintain the register
> (Which would be difficult because you may not know of all the systems in
> use)
> you have to sell the idea to the ine stakeholders
>
> unless the register is mandatory by law across all possible jurisdictions
> which I dont expect to happen
> But let us know how you want to shape this vision further
>
> I still have not figured a way, will share when I do
>
> P
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 8:48 PM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The core of our proposal for the Register of AI Systems (RAIS) would
>> leverage the insights gained using StratML for AI KR.
>>
>> Simply put, core elements of RAIS include those used to explain Strategy,
>> value chain, objectives, goals, KR utilization and  KPIs that measure
>> output / outcome.
>>
>> cheers
>> Carl
>>
>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 9:04 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Carl
>>> Yesterday a report was published on this theme
>>> https://automatingsociety.algorithmwatch.org/
>>>
>>> Both Governance and explainability are open issues
>>> If you couLD put together a concrete proposal, we can send it out as a WG
>>>
>>> But we need to discuss it, I am not sure a registry would cover all the
>>> instances
>>> and it would be an administrative overhead.
>>>
>>> Shall we open a draft and discuss some possibilities?
>>> PDM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:38 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   Executive summary Mind the gap: How to fill the equality and AI
>>>> accountability gap in an automated world Institute for the Future of Work
>>>> Governance and regulation We need a new approach to governance and
>>>> regulation of data-driven, machine-based decision making. This approach
>>>> must be principle-driven and human-centred, work across the entire
>>>> innovation cycle, shift our emphasis to preventative action, and align our
>>>> legal regimes and regulators. ...
>>>>
>>>> https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5f57d40eb1c2ef22d8a8ca7e/5f9850d5410374c05fdc9a84_IFOW-ETF-Report-(v7-27.10.20).pdf
>>>>
>>>>  .. the Institute for the Future of Work established a
>>>> cross-disciplinary Equality Task Force (ETF) to examine how algorithms and
>>>> artificial intelligence impact equality and fairness at work
>>>>
>>>>  ..  encourage systematic mapping of deployment and register of systems
>>>> involving some uses of algorithmic AI and ML systems to inform the public
>>>> and policy-making debates,   ...
>>>>
>>>> enjoy
>>>>
>>>> Carl Mattocks
>>>> co-chair AIKRCG
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It was a pleasure to clarify
>>>>
>>>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>