Re: U.S. Federal Data Strategy

Thank you for your availability to explain about BC Risks
I cc Killian who is also working on BC

I have taken time to read about the BC but never
found  concrete examples that could be evaluabled (for soundness,
integrity, auditability)
Only talk, so I became a bit skeptical

Amithab (and Killian) please why dont you record a short  videotalk
addressing the key points that can be then followed
by a group's call if the videotalk instigates topics for discussion?

Here my questions to the group related to another thread
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aikr/2020Oct/0000.html

I d be grateful if you could help answer some of the open questions from
that post

 please provide some working examples of thenblockchain, in particular
in relation to its transparency, auditability. I Would like to
evaluate any blockchain transaction end to end to assess its
accountability against standard auditability criteria, So far, I have
been unable to do so because although people say that the blockchain
is a way to uphold transparency and accountability nobody that I know
of has been able to see anything, let alone auditedThis latter remark
comes from a KR point of view ie if we were to standardize the
knowledge representation for the blockchain,whatwould that look like?
what concepts, elements, entities, constructs, algorithms
relationships etc would be there







On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:04 AM Amitabh Srivastava <am_srivastav@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Hi Gentlemen,
>
> Nice to meet everyone virtually.  I would love to chat about blockchain
> and AI, and learn from each of you, since you ARE subject matter experts!
> We should plan to get on a video call in December and say “hi.”  I
> volunteer Owen to set up the video call.  LOL!!
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Amitabh Srivastav
> am_srivastav@yahoo.com
> 613.262.6569
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2020, at 20:27, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Owen, and Michaela ( Istanbul in 2009!)
> Glad to see you two connect
>
> Just to clarify, I know a few things about AI, nothing about blockchain
>
> I had never seen Amithabh risks - was this circulated before?
> Could not find any mails in my inbox, but maybe I can learn something
> about the blockchain
> from that resource
>
> Keep us in the loop!
> Best
> PDM
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:41 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your kind comments, Mihaela, as well as for the invitation to
>> connect on LinkedIn.  My talking points, with links to the references I
>> cited, are available at
>> https://stratml.us/references/FederalDataStrategy2021.pdf
>>
>> Nick, Federal Data Strategy Action Plan for FY 2020 is available in
>> StratML format, at https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#2020AP, along
>> with a link that opens it in an XForm in the event that anyone may wish to
>> turn it into a performance report and track progress on the performance
>> indicators it sets forth.  When the FY 2021 plan comes together, I'll
>> render it in StratML format as well.
>>
>> Mihaela, I see that we have 51 mutual contacts on LinkedIn.  In light of
>> your interest in AI and Blockchain, here are a few more of my contacts with
>> whom you may wish to connect:
>>
>> Carl Mattocks & Paola Di Maio, who co-chair the W3C's AIKR CG, in which I
>> am participating: https://www.linkedin.com/in/carlmattocks/ |
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/paoladimaio/ |
>> https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIKRCG
>>
>> Amitabh Srivastav, who crafted the Blockchain risk assessment
>> considerations that I rendered in StratML format at
>> https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#BCCUC  |
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitabhsrivastav/
>>
>> My interest in Blockchain is highlighted in the last sentence of my
>> article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document
>>
>> If you  see prospects for collaboration in support of the vision of the
>> StratML standard, please let me know.
>>
>> BTW, as time permits, I will convert to StratML format the website about
>> us statements for some or all of the organizations represented by the
>> speakers today.  These are already in the collection:
>>
>> Data Coalition - https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#DTC
>>
>> NSDI - https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#NSDI2020
>>
>> Arnold Ventures - https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AV
>>
>> IHEP - https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IHEP
>>
>> COS - https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#COS
>>
>> In the latter, note that I have created a version of their about
>> statement that incorporates their performance indicators from GuideStar.  I
>> look forward to they day I will no longer need to do that because .gov
>> agency and tax-favored orgs are publishing their own performance plans and
>> reports in open, standard, machine-readable format.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>>    - Dr. Mihaela Ulieru
>>    <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mihaelaulieru/?lipi=urn%3Ali%3Apage%3Ad_flagship3_messaging%3Bo%2Fr88Nj5TcqqWbK%2FHUM3ww%3D%3D>
>>
>>    1st degree connection· 1st
>>    President, IMPACT Institute for the Digital Economy - Technology
>>    Alchemist Innovating at the nexus AI/IoT/Blockchain
>>    - TODAYDr. Mihaela Ulieru sent the following message at 4:34 PM
>>    View Dr. Mihaela’s profile[image: Dr. Mihaela Ulieru]
>>    <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mihaelaulieru/>
>>    Dr. Mihaela Ulieru  <https://www.linkedin.com/in/mihaelaulieru/> 4:34
>>    PM
>>
>>    Wonderful thoughts on the Federal Data Panel today!
>>
>>
>