Re: StratML for AIKR follow up notes

Thanks a lot Car, much appreciated!
Kindly send out a remind for the next meeting a day or so before
cheers
P

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 3:22 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> At the March10 online meeting we agreed to continue the work of assessing
> the value of StratML for AIKR.
>
>
>    - Two of the invited experts agreed to join the CG.
>
>
> To facilitate our work Paola setup the AIKRREPO cloud storage
>
>    - Audio of first two meetings are stored in  AIKRREPO
>
> We agreed that we should Walk the Talk  and use StratML to manage our work
> :
>
>    - AIKRCG will have  a Strategy to  'assess the value of StratML for
>    AIKR'
>    - AIKRCG will use StratMl to document how 'Evaluate Trustworthy AIKR
>    objects implemented by machine learning powered services'
>
>
> Latest draft of the document 'Evaluate Trustworthy AIKR objects
> implemented by machine learning powered services' is stored in AIKRREPO
>
> Next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday March 31st
>
> Carl Mattocks
> cochair AIKRCG
>
> Be Safe to Keep Healthy
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:09 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks to those who participated in the call yesterday, nice to hear
>> people voices
>> and please share follow up emails on the list perhaps?
>> Look forward to the summary of actions, Carl please remind us what we are
>> supposed to do
>> Two quick points from me
>> 1. Chris and Owen said that when they tried it the search function
>> generated with google code over stratml documents didnt work. the first
>> thing that comes to mind is a granularity problem.  If the GOALS in Stratml
>> are chunked  as paragraphs, even long wordy paragraphs, and the search
>> function/parser is set to identify individual phonemes/words, then running
>> the query would not yield results, or at least not good ones
>> Could it be a question of modelling the documents in a more granular way,
>> or simply attaching more specific metadata/keywords to each set - say,
>> GOALS so that the engines can easily identify matching content? Assume we
>> can add keywords to each section of the strategy plan then these keywords
>> would also have to be added to the search engine (tell the engine what to
>> look for using certain parameters as opposed to guessing). This could
>> increase the precision of the recall
>> Let me know if this make sense?  Glad to see that jorge is keen to work
>> on the query, look forward
>> to be seeing what he his planning
>>
>> 2.  is there a workflow/dependency between
>> GOAL(s), ACTION(s), OUTCOME RESULT   RECOMMENDATION.more action in
>> StratML?
>>
>> I have seen in a related post call email that it is possible to set up
>> reminders which I think would do the job, but it would be also good imho to
>> model GOAL ACTION OUTCOME RESULT new action as a set
>> Or something similar
>>
>> Will reply to off list emails soon, thanks a lot for helping to advance
>> this
>> I encourage off ist emails to be shared on list mostly for archiving
>> purposes
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> PDM
>>
>