Re: symbolic equation?

It isn't only in computer science and math that we find this confusion. Just look at what are loosely defined as life and bio sciences.
There is not even an consensus about what actually are the life sciences, and what are bio sciences.
In my efforts to come up with the smart city framework for disease control and prevention a very frustrating point is exactly this non-standardized cross-sectoral use of terminology for e.g. immunology, virology, epidemiology, computational medicine and biology.
Even in the broader field of medicine which encompasses medical technology, medical imaging, biomedical, pharmaceutical and biotech fields and the entire scope of medical technologies (prescription drugs, in vitro technologies and supplies, medical supplies and devices), and also includes software as a medical devices (e.g. AI), eHealth, mHealth and telemedicine it is impossible to avoid ambiguity in natural language processing.
And this is one of the main challenges in furthering the (ethical) use of AI in medicine.
It may sound as not much of a really interesting goal for AI KR, but coming up with systems to standardize terminology, and in particular for cross-sectoral use is necessary.
Just a thought.

Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Saturday, June 27, 2020, 9:00:42 PM ADT, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:  
 
 What are you referring to?  It seems the expression used "symbolic equation" should be mathematical equation.
And for the record there is no complete encyclopedia of modern mathematics.
The image in the tweet is a pipe dream. To get from the graph network to the mathematical equation is utter simplification. Science requires that a hypothesis must be falsifiable. Running the same data with multiple AI systems will still require humans to validate the hypothesis. Testing the hypothesis requires a level of reasoning that can produce e.g. though experiments or comparison with similar theories in other fields. And also requires an interplay of formal and non-formal thinking and switching between natural language and mathematical expression that is beyond the current grasp of AI.

Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development 

    On Friday, June 26, 2020, 10:13:47 PM ADT, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 I am not a mathematician, but I love to browse the encyclopedia of mathematics
I found some references in Matlab and recent papers but there is no such thing (that I could find) in the Encyclopedia of Mathematicshttps://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=%22symbolic+equation%22&button=  
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 7:40 AM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:

I  am not sure I understand the construct symbolic equation in this slideanyone could like to comment/explain?
https://twitter.com/ykilcher/status/1276158135258972161/photo/1