- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:38:20 +0800
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Sq=pg_-LZo=Qsm3H1i5T7=PwCPhtF1tmVD-0Dh4RrvfHA@mail.gmail.com>
thank you, when I click on the links the section in the hashtag does not open On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:37 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > Here are the two most recent additions to the StratML collection: > > ABOUT ML Project - https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AML > > Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable > Claims - https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#MSVC > > in the latter, the very first objective is directly related to the StratML > standard: > > Objective 1.1: Goals & Values > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml#_1589903e-aebb-11ea-863f-edd70a83ea00> > - Clarify the goals and values. > > Others include: > > Objective 6.1: Criteria, Objectives & Frameworks > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml#_937934a4-af42-11ea-867a-27142883ea00> > - Establish consensus on the criteria, objectives, and frameworks for > interpretability research. > > Objective 7.3: Benchmarks > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml#_9379482c-af42-11ea-867a-27142883ea00> > - Develop benchmarks for PPML to unify goals and measure progress. [PPML > stands for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning.] > > Objective 7.6: Standardization & Interoperability > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml#_93795542-af42-11ea-867a-27142883ea00> > - Work on standardization/interoperability. > > Objective 9.1: Standardization > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml#_93796956-af42-11ea-867a-27142883ea00> > - Assess the feasibility of standardizing compute accounting. > > Objective 9.2: Reporting > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSVCwStyle.xml#_93796d16-af42-11ea-867a-27142883ea00> > - Automate or simplify compute reporting. > > With reference to ABOUT ML's plan, it would be good if the guide > contemplated in this objective were published as a model performance plan > in StratML Part 2 format: > > Objective 2.1: Guidance > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AMLwStyle.xml#_41c51098-af19-11ea-bd1a-b48e1e83ea00> > - Develop a guide to initiating and scaling a documentation pilot. > > With reference to Objective 1.2: Questions > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AMLwStyle.xml#_41c50cba-af19-11ea-bd1a-b48e1e83ea00> > - Gather questions in a database, there are currently 183 in their > database > <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HYlWBos7AXxV4TRvWkK_EF6iFFWNjk8NEevlh1JC9Bk/edit#gid=0>. > From my perspective, it would be good if those questions were restated as > objectives in an open, standard, machine-readable format like StratML. > That's more than I am motivated to do right now, but for anyone who may be > interested in checking them out, the database includes the URLs for the > research papers from which the questions were gleaned. > > Owen >
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2020 03:39:11 UTC