- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:45:49 +0800
- To: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SrgzkcEZB=fK2W2DXgXLTfET2V7DYoBxKicPB2LB5w88Q@mail.gmail.com>
To clarify the role of KR, we can take the example of the AI Strategist Plan being drafted, as per the last meeting The plan had been started a week before, and was describing some lifecycle development activities, by applying logic and reasoning and understanding of the topic - AI KR it is possible to see that the plan was being devised was completely drifting from its title This is what KR ultimately does: ensures that what is being done is what is being said, and that appropriate concepts and vocabulary are adopted By applying KR we can show that that the plan was drifting from its initial intention, so that we can adjust our focus accordingly We called it the AI strategy plan but were starting jotting down the lifecycle phases (in a rather messy way and using very casual terminology) I dont think it is necessary to have studied to understand AI, after all it is possible for children to implement a fairly sophisticated robot these days using a Mindstorm Lego kit simply following the instructions However KR has generally evolved as an academic discipline, and the clever bits of AI are part of KR As AI advances, KR is becoming more critical to ensure systems are what they say they are and do what they say they do, yet KR is poorly understood, as Chris and Owen confirm, despite having been on this list for some time, they still have doubts about what it is about. This is my research interest and the main motive for setting up the group as an open forum and possible outlet So I ll produce an essential reading list on KR for members, and this could also be a deliverable /outcome of this CG, so that we can reduce the learning curve for newcomers to the subject and help to make it clear what is it that we are doing, and why - Of course if people dont know AI and KR, they may struggle to make contributions to the core topic of this CG It would help to understand a bit of Logic - especially non monotonic logic https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-nonmonotonic/ If people come from engineering background, rather than complex science or information science it should still be possible to acknowledte the less mechanistic (trivial) and more intellectual level of AI challenges that we are trying to address with our work This book can be browsed online https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ppX8wf7kkHkC&rdid=book-ppX8wf7kkHkC&rdot=1&source=gbs_vpt_read&pcampaignid=books_booksearch_viewport it touches upon KR briefly I ll work on some resources and an essential reading list, and I ll also work on emphasising the KR related issues for those who find it difficult to focus on them . It is a rather academic topic and I am happy to make it more accessible for anyone This is the role of the learning resources which will be one of the deliverables of this CG
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 01:46:40 UTC