- From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 07:18:17 +0800
- To: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Soybw7HTLLXoQKfpyv3xAVRc3vVhnn=J1cVOAX3Wftgfw@mail.gmail.com>
Milton Please share with us the work you are doing AI KR including any alternative models/diagrams you may have, In case we missed it so that we can include it in the CG report P On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:08 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > Dear Paola, > > I must emphatically ask "work being done by WHOM"????!!!! Your erratic > behavior is unbecoming and pardon my French, but the eerie feeling I am > getting is that ONE person is setting the tone for everything we do in this > AIKR CG. > > And your world view of AI and KR my dear, frankly SUCKS. > > I was being considerate in expressing that I disagree with your diagram. > But now Ii must emphatically stress the fact that it is wrong. Period. > > I am Dutch of birth, Dutch by academic education and Dutch in most of the > things I do. Bluntly said, I do not like the road you are taking us on with > this AI KR CG. And criticism and academic dissent do not agree or sit well > with you. > > Do not think you can preside over this CG like it is your personal fiefdom. > > And I would appreciate some of the members of this CG also address the > issue of where we want to go with this AI KR CG. > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Tuesday, July 7, 2020, 8:29:21 PM ADT, Paola Di Maio < > paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Milton' > Thanks for your input > What you suggest is interesting but not in the scope of the work being done > we ll wait for your diagram at your convenience > P > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:19 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < > metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Dear Paola > > The sensory input must factor in four categories, physical sciences, > social sciences, life and bio sciences and philosophy. > > Each of these four fields have different paradigms for application of the > the scientific method, in practice resulting in either statistical, quantum > or deterministic bias. > > And there are the issues of Sensory data and Sensory perception, which for > quantum physicists and Buddhist philosophers alike are well known issues, > that come into play. > > Choosing to observe and record data about (a system of) objects creates > statistical and deterministic and/or quantum bias, and it can be either at > the observed, perceived or recorded data level. > > There is another way of visualizing bias by using an optical diagram with > a focal point (lens), the observed object left of the focal point and > perceived/recorded object right of the of the focal point. Using > intersecting lines that go through the focal point, you get two cones. > > The right cone incorporates the bias. The deterministic, statistical and > quantum bias created at sense data level create an out of focus imaging > from observation to recording in the optical diagram. > > I hope you can figure out how to put this an a diagram. I am swamped in > work, and do not have the time to digitally create what is needed in a > diagram. > > cheers > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Monday, July 6, 2020, 8:29:01 PM ADT, Paola Di Maio < > paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Milton, > Thanks > I am interested to hear alternative views - if they make sense, I ll > incorporate them > > The diagram represents factors contributing to systemic bias there is no > spiral in the diagram as such, however, your perceptual bias, which is the > first level of entanglement of systemic bias, may lead you to see this as a > spiral > Somewhat your comment proves the point that the first level of bias may be > perceptual (sensory) > > if you notice, there are no inputs > in any of the factors- > Perceptual bias is however based on sensory input, like cognitive bias is > based on knowledge input > If this diagram evolves into a causal map, that may be a good idea to have > second level diagram > witht the input factors- > > Please provide an alternative diagram showing your view of systemic > bias, if you have any? > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:33 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program < > metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote: > > The diagram is based on deterministic worldview. Our world is quantum > physical and deterministic. And unfortunately I must disagree with the > outward spiraling sequence. I see no sensory input item there. > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Saturday, July 4, 2020, 11:04:51 PM ADT, Paola Di Maio < > paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > In relation to an earlier exchange, where I suggested that KR can be used > to reduce systemic bias, I am sharing with our CGs a characterization of > systemic bias - since it is poorly defined > in the literature. There is an element of cognitive bias which I hope > can be of interest to CogAI > The model is part of a research project on (KR) Neurosymbolic IntegrationI > am offering it also for evaluation/discussion and eventually will be > included as a deliverable (when eventually we get to publish a CG report) > I am working of part 2 of the model which drills into other aspects > of systemic bias, will follow > [image: image.png] > > > >
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 23:19:14 UTC