Re: Applications of AI KR future drafts

please share materials that best demonstrate non-anthropocentric modeling.

carl
It was a pleasure to clarify


On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:54 PM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Again I must stress the point that anthropocentric thinking in AI and thus
> KR will severely limit its applications.
>
> We already distinguish autonomous agents, autonomous vehicles, robots,
> drones, intelligent devices and software programs all endowed with AI.
>
> To assume everything is human computer interaction is a gross mistake.
>
> For food production (agriculture, husbandry, fisheries, aquaponics,
> horticulture and silvoculture) interaction with animal species is part of
> the activities delegated to autonomous agents and robots e.g.
>
> In biodiversity protection and monitoring and for that matter biological
> research in the wild through observations the interaction is NOT with
> humans.
>
> Modeling sentience, sapience, intelligence and behavior requires
> non-anthropocentric modeling.
>
> And in future space exploration, where exobiology comes into play we must
> definitely discard this anthropocentric and even terracentric thinking.
>
> The definition diagram of  AI in the high level expert group of the
> European Union on the roadmap for AI research reflects my point of view.
>
> It is IMHO something typical of the Anglo Saxon world and to a lesser
> extent some Asian countries to focus entirely on HCI and anthropocentric
> thinking, because of what I suspect is driven by mass surveillance
> applications.
>
> AI and AI driven machines and devices will become commonplace in so many
> consumer and industry settings that this limited thinking will hamper
> exciting research into new applications.
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 1, 2020, 1:00:06 PM ADT, carl mattocks <
> carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> A guiding principle is that AIKR systems must mitigate risks linked to
> bias, security and control
>
> which is identified in this report focused on  Using AI to better manage
> the environment
>
>
> https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/press-releases/2019/ai-realise-gains-environment.html
>
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 7:43 PM Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Amirouche
> People are struggling with
> - truth/factchecking
> - consistency
> - understandabiliy
> - ethics/bias
> Scholarly papers only show one side of the topics, what has not been
> suppressed
> Academia is heavily constrained, and controlled by the industry
> The media mostly parrots, occasionally is critical about what is being
> done and said
> but it is worth reading the media critically because it is a showcase of
> misery, pointing directly to the
> problem spaces
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:23 AM Amirouche Boubekki <
> amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le lun. 29 juin 2020 à 21:37, carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> >
> > within context of ' Intelligence Augmentation ' ..  AIKR should improve
> the acceptance of new knowledge provided by the computer-teacher.
> >
> > When that is true - what type of new knowledge do you think would have
> the greatest value?
>
> At the moment I would like the understand what are the big ideas in AI
> KR&R? What are the big trends? Where people struggle? Where there are
> debates?
>
> My understanding is that to know that I need to find the good paper
> (or the good person) to help me with that, the alternative is to read
> 50 years or so of papers about the subject.
>
> >
> > It was a pleasure to clarify
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:42 PM Amirouche Boubekki <
> amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Toward understanding better the goal of the group, I am trying to
> >> understand what would be the applications that one could build upon
> >> AIKR future drafts.
> >>
> >> It is still not clear to me what a specification regarding Knowledge
> >> Representation could look like.
> >>
> >> The simple goal that I read often about AI is something along those
> lines:
> >>
> >> > Make computers do what humans do
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> > Enable human level of cognition in computers
> >>
> >> The first thing those goals fail to recognize is that machines are
> >> already better than humans regarding some tasks. More generally, I
> >> think it is easier to think in terms of Intelligence Augmentation:
> >>
> >>   How the machine can help humans perform better at intellectual tasks?
> >>
> >> Hence, the question:
> >>
> >>   What area of human endeavor can still be improved using computers?
> >>
> >> I fail to think outside-the-box, so I will fall back to my own needs:
> >>
> >>   I need computers to help me acquire new knowledge.
> >>
> >> That is, I want the computer to help me learn new things. Simply, I
> >> want a computer-teacher.
> >>
> >> Questions:
> >>
> >> 1) What intellectual task do you think computers should help you with?
> >>
> >> 2) What will be applications of AI KR specifications?
> >>
>
>
> --
> Amirouche ~ https://hyper.dev
>
>