Re: New slides on Cognitive AI

forgot to say:
although yes it is true that the have developed separately , AI and
intelligent systems in general
is  modelled on human cognition - from concepts to language to semantic
networks
etc- because human cognition is the most advance model of explicit
cognition (intelligence) we know of
(afaik)


On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:11 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ah, I understand what you mean
>
>   Much of the work on AI has very little connection to the cognitive
> sciences and has been conducted as a separate discipline with very little
> contact between the respective communities,
>
>
> The reason there could be partly historical, and partly due to AI becoming
> constrained and segregated  by mathematics and hard Computer science
> the history of AI began in the fifties, or a few decades before (
> while Cognitive Science started to become formalized in the seventies
>
> Yes, I had to build my own bewildering map of intelligence (not shared yet)
> as it seems to be everywhere in some form, yet we are still trying to
> define it :-)
>
>
>
>> Much of the work on AI has very little connection to the cognitive
>> sciences and has been conducted as a separate discipline with very little
>> contact between the respective communities, e.g. work on search, formal
>> logic, natural language, robotics, and even artificial neural networks,
>> e.g. contrast the work on deep learning with that on computational models
>> for neuroscience by Chris Eliasmith.
>>
>>
>>
>> PDM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 2:02 PM Paul Alagna <pjalagna@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All;
>>> Paola asked
>>> <<aren't all AI systems cognitive?>> This got me thinking about what a
>>> cognitive system is and what is its relationship to AI. So I grabbed
>>> websters for a definition:
>>> ====
>>> the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding
>>> through thought, experience, and the senses.
>>> ====
>>> and began to break down each fragment into data science/AI terms:
>>>
>>> the mental action or process (lets go with processes)
>>> of acquiring (==the input of and storing of)
>>> knowledge(==information?) and
>>> understanding(==being able to use? IE having actions of
>>> usage)OR(==having a correct usage)
>>> through
>>> -- thought(==internal learning),
>>> -- experience(==external learning), and
>>> -- the senses(==environmental input).
>>> ====
>>> so, do you agree with my equivalencies? knowledge(==information?), etc.
>>>
>>> Are all AI systems cognitive? this was Paola's question.
>>> No not ALL. some have no provision for internal learning, or for
>>> environmental inputs. Or in the case of partially taught systems a complete
>>> "understanding".
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> PAUL ALAGNA
>>> PJAlagna@Gmail.com <PJAlagna@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 10, 2020, at 10:26 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> for me all AI is cognitive, is there a way to distinguish it from non
>>> cognitive?
>>> P
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:05 AM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’ve published a new slide deck that explains how cognitive agents can
>>>> be implemented as a suite of components for perception, feelings, thought,
>>>> action and cognitive databases.
>>>>
>>>> See: https://www.w3.org/Data/demos/chunks/chunks-20200110.pdf
>>>>
>>>> This in support of the new Cognitive AI Community Group, where we are
>>>> still at an early stage, and plan to soon have a GitHub repository for
>>>> documentation and issue tracking, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>>>> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things
>>
>>
>>
>>