Re: New slides on Cognitive AI

Ah, I understand what you mean

  Much of the work on AI has very little connection to the cognitive
sciences and has been conducted as a separate discipline with very little
contact between the respective communities,


The reason there could be partly historical, and partly due to AI becoming
constrained and segregated  by mathematics and hard Computer science
the history of AI began in the fifties, or a few decades before (
while Cognitive Science started to become formalized in the seventies

Yes, I had to build my own bewildering map of intelligence (not shared yet)
as it seems to be everywhere in some form, yet we are still trying to
define it :-)



> Much of the work on AI has very little connection to the cognitive
> sciences and has been conducted as a separate discipline with very little
> contact between the respective communities, e.g. work on search, formal
> logic, natural language, robotics, and even artificial neural networks,
> e.g. contrast the work on deep learning with that on computational models
> for neuroscience by Chris Eliasmith.
>
>
>
> PDM
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 2:02 PM Paul Alagna <pjalagna@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All;
>> Paola asked
>> <<aren't all AI systems cognitive?>> This got me thinking about what a
>> cognitive system is and what is its relationship to AI. So I grabbed
>> websters for a definition:
>> ====
>> the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding
>> through thought, experience, and the senses.
>> ====
>> and began to break down each fragment into data science/AI terms:
>>
>> the mental action or process (lets go with processes)
>> of acquiring (==the input of and storing of)
>> knowledge(==information?) and
>> understanding(==being able to use? IE having actions of usage)OR(==having
>> a correct usage)
>> through
>> -- thought(==internal learning),
>> -- experience(==external learning), and
>> -- the senses(==environmental input).
>> ====
>> so, do you agree with my equivalencies? knowledge(==information?), etc.
>>
>> Are all AI systems cognitive? this was Paola's question.
>> No not ALL. some have no provision for internal learning, or for
>> environmental inputs. Or in the case of partially taught systems a complete
>> "understanding".
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> Thanks
>> PAUL ALAGNA
>> PJAlagna@Gmail.com <PJAlagna@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2020, at 10:26 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> for me all AI is cognitive, is there a way to distinguish it from non
>> cognitive?
>> P
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:05 AM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I’ve published a new slide deck that explains how cognitive agents can
>>> be implemented as a suite of components for perception, feelings, thought,
>>> action and cognitive databases.
>>>
>>> See: https://www.w3.org/Data/demos/chunks/chunks-20200110.pdf
>>>
>>> This in support of the new Cognitive AI Community Group, where we are
>>> still at an early stage, and plan to soon have a GitHub repository for
>>> documentation and issue tracking, etc.
>>>
>>> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>>> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things
>
>
>
>