Re: kr for egov lit rev

Thank you Carl

minimal  but that would be fine with me, perhaps when you finally enter
your statement in the wiki, you could elaborate a bit more (if you know
already what you plan to contribute to the documents for example)

can you please elaborate on the element inventory? so that we can
understand/agree on that task before you power ahead with this mysterious
yet fairly intriguing point? I have no idea what you mean here.

 How do these elements fit in/support the overall AI KR , and the CG group
goals mission please

I hope your access to wiki is resolved soon, so that you can enter your
statement
 anyone else having trouble editing the wiki?

Thanks fo the long term good wishes-
let us all wish ourselves and others a good decade ahead, why not

Thanks a lot
P


On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 4:54 AM carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> To help the AI KR progress in 2020 as co-chair I propose to be:
>  Co-editor of  https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/
>  Lead editor of an  AI KR Element Inventory
>  Key contributor to AIKR eGovernance documents
>
> and continue to be a general factotum
>
>
> wishing us all a happy new decade
>
> Carl Mattocks
>
> It was a pleasure to clarify
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:45 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Milton
>>
>> Glad you like the idea - I am thinking of a handbook that can serve as a
>> general guidance for different domains, with one version aimed at
>> egovernance.
>>
>> I see the focus egovernance rather than egovernment, but there is a lot
>> of material
>> on the latter, that we could abstract from to make it relevant and
>> generalized to fit the former
>>
>> there is still some work to be done in terms of aligning
>> different knowledge domain,
>>
>> also, I am working on a few parallel topics - diverse branches of KR
>> applications
>> with several deadlines coming up in the next few months
>>
>> thanks for the suggestion of starting a lit review on KR for governance
>>
>> Some of the resources I d like to include in a lit review are not
>> accessible
>> (started a search some time ago) and still searching for ways to access
>> them
>>
>> However there are some good resources openly accessible
>>
>> I started a tag on zotero
>>
>> https://www.zotero.org/groups/2351244/knowledge_representation/items/tag/governance
>>
>>
>> please add resources and start drafting whatever inspires you
>>
>> I am working on specific aspects of KR for eGov, and will share when
>> ready, but in the meantime, good idea to start gathering the field
>>
>>
>> PDM
>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 12:39 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
>> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear members of the AIKR CG. I am particularly interested in the issue
>>> of AI and KR for eGovernance and eGovernment.
>>> The UNCAC (United Nationas Convention Against Corruption) and AML/CFT
>>> treaties (anti money laundering/combating financing of terrorism) are very
>>> specific in compliance and thus governance, but everything else is still
>>> vague including what should constitute corporate, social, environmental,
>>> human rights and sustainable development governance and the Sustainable
>>> Development Goals do not in particular help clearly define governance.
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact there is no clear definition of the boundaries, overlapping
>>> issues and distinction between legislation/law enforcement/compliance,
>>> moral conduct, ethical conduct/codes, corporate governance/rules of
>>> conduct, governance/guidelines.
>>>
>>> Thus eGovernance is highly context sensitive, which makes the KR very
>>> important and the AI component determining the context/environment very
>>> important as well.
>>>
>>> What would be very useful is some essays on how to map from a
>>> generalized set of concepts and ontologies onto the currently more familiar
>>> areas of legislation, legal guidelines, ethical codes of conduct and the
>>> various forms of more or less well established corporate, social and
>>> environmental governance.
>>>
>>> A useful starting point would be to do a literature review on ontologies
>>> and indicators for governance.
>>>
>>> Again, very good idea the eBook on AI and KR for eGovernance.
>>>
>>> Milton Ponson
>>> GSM: +297 747 8280
>>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
>>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>>> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
>>> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
>>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>>>
>>>
>>> On Saturday, December 28, 2019, 1:58:22 AM AST, Paola Di Maio <
>>> paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Seasons Greetings!
>>>
>>> Thank you OwEn, Ronald and Predeep for volunteering to participate in
>>> this work if our abstract for the conference is accepted.  I have
>>> elaborated a bit and submitted as discussed
>>>
>>> https://iacio.org/call-for-paper-open-now-for-15th-iac-annual-conference-sept-2020-washington-d-c/
>>>
>>>
>>> Since the topic sees to be spiking some interest in the community and we
>>> have 4 volunteers including myself already on the case, plus two almost
>>> co-chairs showing wish for more involvement in  the co leadership  of this
>>> CG (much appreciated!) I would suggest that we may want to start drafting
>>> an ebook and perhaps arrange a call sometime in January to have a chat
>>> about how to go about things - like division of labour, finding a
>>> publisher, and copyright issues.  It goes without saying that if someone is
>>> willing to contribute and prefers to do so via email, is welcome to do so,
>>> I myself do not join calls often.
>>>
>>> I have written and published monographs in the past, but have hopes that
>>> this CG can produce something collaboratively.
>>>
>>> So, this is an invitation to all members, especially those who have
>>> expressed interest in the topic AI KR for EGovernance, to:
>>> a)  discuss with myself and others how to go about writing and
>>> publishing a handbook on the topic - especially  managing the
>>> collaboration, copyright an finding a publisher. we could self publish an
>>> open source synopsis via this group and/or find a publisher-
>>> b) put your name in the doc above, start thinking and putting together a
>>> few paragraphs/pages/a chapter for a Handbook
>>> c) Let others know if they are willing to be on  a call, doodle will
>>> follow for those interested
>>> (sound effect) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOm8m1aue2Y>
>>> PDM
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:02 PM Pradeep Jain <pradeep.jain@ictect.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm also local to DC and happy to contribute in any way I can.
>>>
>>> Pradeep
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From:* Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 20, 2019 8:37:39 PM
>>> *To:* Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>> *Cc:* Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>; W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>;
>>> Pradeep Jain <pradeep.jain@ictect.com>; Mark Patrick <
>>> mark.patrick7759@gmail.com>; William Glascoe III <eosocxo@comcast.net>
>>> *Subject:* Re: Paper and talk in 2020, Arlington
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Please enter any of the (brief) points you wish you contribute to this
>>> submission in the abstract section
>>> (specifically related to KR for transparency and accountability)
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit
>>>
>>> (preferably before dec 24)
>>>
>>> I ll submit it asap
>>>
>>> We can then elaborate the points  into a page or section for a paper
>>> submission to some journal, if academic publication is of interest to this
>>> group and maybe  with a practical handbook for CIOs, which could be our own
>>> publication and free gift to the world
>>>
>>> PDM
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:16 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since my July 1999 paper on KM is difficult to read in the original
>>> HTML, I have now published it in PDF at http://ambur.net/6thGenKM.pdf
>>>
>>> The 33rd end note is somewhat ironic.  It says:
>>>
>>> Balla concludes: With every release of Microsoft Office, Windows NT and
>>> Exchange, Microsoft is moving closer and closer to providing a platform
>>> that organizations can use as an infrastructure for their KM initiative.
>>> Microsoft has even announced a major focus on KM for its upcoming product
>>> versions... thanks to Microsoft's marketing muscle, the KM industry will
>>> become legitimized overnight.
>>>
>>> It has been a fairly long night and it seems doubtful even now that MS
>>> Project Cortex can be taken as more than merely a new beginning, in a
>>> proprietary environment.
>>>
>>> On page 12, I quoted Savage as suggesting,  "... teams should be
>>> responsible for defining their goals, purpose, and mission - together with
>>> their project plan - in a shareable database."  For public objectives, I
>>> now believe that "database" should be the Internet.  See
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-only-had-brain-evolving-prefrontal-core-text-internet-owen-ambur/,
>>> whose title has an amazingly coincidental parallel to MS's new project.
>>>
>>> Owen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/20/2019 1:15 PM, Ronald Reck wrote:
>>>
>>> I am local to DC, I am out of town right now and cant review this thread in detail right now.
>>> I am happy to contribute and help with delivery.
>>>
>>> -Ronald P. Reck
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:44:52 +0800, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot Owen
>>>
>>> are you local to DC?
>>>
>>> I think we just need to send the abstract asap
>>>  then start working on a paper hoping that we can agree on scope and
>>> language
>>>
>>>  KR is the way we can hold  government guys accountable, we just need to
>>> make
>>> a compelling case for them.
>>>
>>> Please feel free to start drafting, glad this resonates with you and
>>> hopefully Carl, who had some input in the Taipei talk as well as hopefully
>>> others of course,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Paola, I am very interested in the use of AI to foster transparency and
>>> accountability in government.  While this May 1998 presentation makes no
>>> reference to AI, it is all about records management and accountability is
>>> all about records, preferably maintained and shared in open, standard,
>>> machine-readable format:  http://ambur.net/ASIS/KMvalue.html
>>>
>>> As revealed by this Google query<https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8> <https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>,
>>> AI is now being widely used to support the classification and management of
>>> records.
>>>
>>> For background on machine-readability, seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document
>>>
>>> See also the closely related provisions of the OPEN Government Data Act
>>> (OGDA):https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>>
>>> Here are some of the plans in the StratML collection that reference AI:
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/C4DINAISwStyle.xml
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DARPAPAIwStyle.xml
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/NAIRDSPwStyle.xml
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AI2wStyle.xml
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/KEwStyle.xml
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FRNTwStyle.xml
>>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMwStyle.xml
>>>
>>> It appears that AIIM may take up the cause of KM again, stimulated by MS Project
>>> Cortex <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml>.  Here are some of
>>> the artifacts generated by AIIM's last pass at that topic, in StratML
>>> format:  http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIIMKM
>>>
>>> I look forward to learning if this group can crowdsource the preparation
>>> of a proposed presentation making a significant contribution to the
>>> advancement of the cause of transparency and accountability in government
>>> at the International Academy of CIO (IAC) conference in Arlington,
>>> Virginia, on September 28 - 30.
>>>
>>> For those whom may be unfamiliar with that IAC, their about statement is
>>> available in StratML format at http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IACTwStyle.xml
>>> In the DC area, this is the IAC more commonly known:http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IAC
>>>
>>> Owen
>>>
>>> On 12/19/2019 8:45 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings folks
>>>
>>> There is an opportunity to make the next contribution to the next AICIO
>>> conference in DC
>>>
>>> I would like to attend in person, if possible,  and maybe that could be an
>>> opportunity to hangout
>>> together and pitch our work to the CIO community, which is so important
>>> (and so much in need of guidance)
>>> or if I cannot attend, maybe we can have someone local to go and present
>>>
>>> Here is more or les what I have in mind,
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>  if someone is inspired to co author, let's pitch
>>> I think the main challenge is to find agreement on what to say
>>> (for example, Carl Own and myself have so far contributed to this topic on
>>> this list
>>> may have different opinions for the direction of this work, and speak
>>> different languages)
>>> I guess thats part of the mission
>>>
>>> I am also reminding co chairs that we are waitinf for their mission
>>> statements
>>> to proceed with their nominations
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> PDM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>