Re: kr for egov lit rev

To help the AI KR progress in 2020 as co-chair I propose to be:
 Co-editor of  https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/
 Lead editor of an  AI KR Element Inventory
 Key contributor to AIKR eGovernance documents

and continue to be a general factotum


wishing us all a happy new decade

Carl Mattocks

It was a pleasure to clarify


On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:45 PM Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Milton
>
> Glad you like the idea - I am thinking of a handbook that can serve as a
> general guidance for different domains, with one version aimed at
> egovernance.
>
> I see the focus egovernance rather than egovernment, but there is a lot of
> material
> on the latter, that we could abstract from to make it relevant and
> generalized to fit the former
>
> there is still some work to be done in terms of aligning
> different knowledge domain,
>
> also, I am working on a few parallel topics - diverse branches of KR
> applications
> with several deadlines coming up in the next few months
>
> thanks for the suggestion of starting a lit review on KR for governance
>
> Some of the resources I d like to include in a lit review are not
> accessible
> (started a search some time ago) and still searching for ways to access
> them
>
> However there are some good resources openly accessible
>
> I started a tag on zotero
>
> https://www.zotero.org/groups/2351244/knowledge_representation/items/tag/governance
>
>
> please add resources and start drafting whatever inspires you
>
> I am working on specific aspects of KR for eGov, and will share when
> ready, but in the meantime, good idea to start gathering the field
>
>
> PDM
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 12:39 AM ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
> metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear members of the AIKR CG. I am particularly interested in the issue of
>> AI and KR for eGovernance and eGovernment.
>> The UNCAC (United Nationas Convention Against Corruption) and AML/CFT
>> treaties (anti money laundering/combating financing of terrorism) are very
>> specific in compliance and thus governance, but everything else is still
>> vague including what should constitute corporate, social, environmental,
>> human rights and sustainable development governance and the Sustainable
>> Development Goals do not in particular help clearly define governance.
>>
>>
>> In fact there is no clear definition of the boundaries, overlapping
>> issues and distinction between legislation/law enforcement/compliance,
>> moral conduct, ethical conduct/codes, corporate governance/rules of
>> conduct, governance/guidelines.
>>
>> Thus eGovernance is highly context sensitive, which makes the KR very
>> important and the AI component determining the context/environment very
>> important as well.
>>
>> What would be very useful is some essays on how to map from a generalized
>> set of concepts and ontologies onto the currently more familiar areas of
>> legislation, legal guidelines, ethical codes of conduct and the various
>> forms of more or less well established corporate, social and environmental
>> governance.
>>
>> A useful starting point would be to do a literature review on ontologies
>> and indicators for governance.
>>
>> Again, very good idea the eBook on AI and KR for eGovernance.
>>
>> Milton Ponson
>> GSM: +297 747 8280
>> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
>> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
>> Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to
>> all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied
>> mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, December 28, 2019, 1:58:22 AM AST, Paola Di Maio <
>> paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Seasons Greetings!
>>
>> Thank you OwEn, Ronald and Predeep for volunteering to participate in
>> this work if our abstract for the conference is accepted.  I have
>> elaborated a bit and submitted as discussed
>>
>> https://iacio.org/call-for-paper-open-now-for-15th-iac-annual-conference-sept-2020-washington-d-c/
>>
>>
>> Since the topic sees to be spiking some interest in the community and we
>> have 4 volunteers including myself already on the case, plus two almost
>> co-chairs showing wish for more involvement in  the co leadership  of this
>> CG (much appreciated!) I would suggest that we may want to start drafting
>> an ebook and perhaps arrange a call sometime in January to have a chat
>> about how to go about things - like division of labour, finding a
>> publisher, and copyright issues.  It goes without saying that if someone is
>> willing to contribute and prefers to do so via email, is welcome to do so,
>> I myself do not join calls often.
>>
>> I have written and published monographs in the past, but have hopes that
>> this CG can produce something collaboratively.
>>
>> So, this is an invitation to all members, especially those who have
>> expressed interest in the topic AI KR for EGovernance, to:
>> a)  discuss with myself and others how to go about writing and publishing
>> a handbook on the topic - especially  managing the collaboration, copyright
>> an finding a publisher. we could self publish an open source synopsis via
>> this group and/or find a publisher-
>> b) put your name in the doc above, start thinking and putting together a
>> few paragraphs/pages/a chapter for a Handbook
>> c) Let others know if they are willing to be on  a call, doodle will
>> follow for those interested
>> (sound effect) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOm8m1aue2Y>
>> PDM
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 9:02 PM Pradeep Jain <pradeep.jain@ictect.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm also local to DC and happy to contribute in any way I can.
>>
>> Pradeep
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 20, 2019 8:37:39 PM
>> *To:* Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>> *Cc:* Ronald Reck <rreck@rrecktek.com>; W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>;
>> Pradeep Jain <pradeep.jain@ictect.com>; Mark Patrick <
>> mark.patrick7759@gmail.com>; William Glascoe III <eosocxo@comcast.net>
>> *Subject:* Re: Paper and talk in 2020, Arlington
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Please enter any of the (brief) points you wish you contribute to this
>> submission in the abstract section
>> (specifically related to KR for transparency and accountability)
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit
>>
>> (preferably before dec 24)
>>
>> I ll submit it asap
>>
>> We can then elaborate the points  into a page or section for a paper
>> submission to some journal, if academic publication is of interest to this
>> group and maybe  with a practical handbook for CIOs, which could be our own
>> publication and free gift to the world
>>
>> PDM
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 4:16 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Since my July 1999 paper on KM is difficult to read in the original HTML,
>> I have now published it in PDF at http://ambur.net/6thGenKM.pdf
>>
>> The 33rd end note is somewhat ironic.  It says:
>>
>> Balla concludes: With every release of Microsoft Office, Windows NT and
>> Exchange, Microsoft is moving closer and closer to providing a platform
>> that organizations can use as an infrastructure for their KM initiative.
>> Microsoft has even announced a major focus on KM for its upcoming product
>> versions... thanks to Microsoft's marketing muscle, the KM industry will
>> become legitimized overnight.
>>
>> It has been a fairly long night and it seems doubtful even now that MS
>> Project Cortex can be taken as more than merely a new beginning, in a
>> proprietary environment.
>>
>> On page 12, I quoted Savage as suggesting,  "... teams should be
>> responsible for defining their goals, purpose, and mission - together with
>> their project plan - in a shareable database."  For public objectives, I
>> now believe that "database" should be the Internet.  See
>> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-only-had-brain-evolving-prefrontal-core-text-internet-owen-ambur/,
>> whose title has an amazingly coincidental parallel to MS's new project.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>>
>> On 12/20/2019 1:15 PM, Ronald Reck wrote:
>>
>> I am local to DC, I am out of town right now and cant review this thread in detail right now.
>> I am happy to contribute and help with delivery.
>>
>> -Ronald P. Reck
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:44:52 +0800, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot Owen
>>
>> are you local to DC?
>>
>> I think we just need to send the abstract asap
>>  then start working on a paper hoping that we can agree on scope and
>> language
>>
>>  KR is the way we can hold  government guys accountable, we just need to
>> make
>> a compelling case for them.
>>
>> Please feel free to start drafting, glad this resonates with you and
>> hopefully Carl, who had some input in the Taipei talk as well as hopefully
>> others of course,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:26 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Paola, I am very interested in the use of AI to foster transparency and
>> accountability in government.  While this May 1998 presentation makes no
>> reference to AI, it is all about records management and accountability is
>> all about records, preferably maintained and shared in open, standard,
>> machine-readable format:  http://ambur.net/ASIS/KMvalue.html
>>
>> As revealed by this Google query<https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8> <https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+for+records+management&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS868US868&oq=AI+for+records+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l7.6274j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>,
>> AI is now being widely used to support the classification and management of
>> records.
>>
>> For background on machine-readability, seehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document
>>
>> See also the closely related provisions of the OPEN Government Data Act
>> (OGDA):https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/open-gov-data-act-machine-readable-records-owen-ambur/
>>
>> Here are some of the plans in the StratML collection that reference AI:
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/C4DINAISwStyle.xml
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DCGMwStyle.xml
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DARPAPAIwStyle.xml
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/NAIRDSPwStyle.xml
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/AI2wStyle.xml
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/KEwStyle.xml
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/FRNTwStyle.xml
>>     http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/DMwStyle.xml
>>
>> It appears that AIIM may take up the cause of KM again, stimulated by MS Project
>> Cortex <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml> <http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml>.  Here are some of
>> the artifacts generated by AIIM's last pass at that topic, in StratML
>> format:  http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIIMKM
>>
>> I look forward to learning if this group can crowdsource the preparation
>> of a proposed presentation making a significant contribution to the
>> advancement of the cause of transparency and accountability in government
>> at the International Academy of CIO (IAC) conference in Arlington,
>> Virginia, on September 28 - 30.
>>
>> For those whom may be unfamiliar with that IAC, their about statement is
>> available in StratML format at http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IACTwStyle.xml
>> In the DC area, this is the IAC more commonly known:http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IAC
>>
>> Owen
>>
>> On 12/19/2019 8:45 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote:
>>
>> Greetings folks
>>
>> There is an opportunity to make the next contribution to the next AICIO
>> conference in DC
>>
>> I would like to attend in person, if possible,  and maybe that could be an
>> opportunity to hangout
>> together and pitch our work to the CIO community, which is so important
>> (and so much in need of guidance)
>> or if I cannot attend, maybe we can have someone local to go and present
>>
>> Here is more or les what I have in mind,
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iZARdPoWeEZzld1iugl5hlaMh7aaYrJkD7SiEycXvdQ/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>  if someone is inspired to co author, let's pitch
>> I think the main challenge is to find agreement on what to say
>> (for example, Carl Own and myself have so far contributed to this topic on
>> this list
>> may have different opinions for the direction of this work, and speak
>> different languages)
>> I guess thats part of the mission
>>
>> I am also reminding co chairs that we are waitinf for their mission
>> statements
>> to proceed with their nominations
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> PDM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>