- From: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:56:03 -0500
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHtonunZ-9u_EsLAEVK7HnHuEEbB5dbUiWQjPE6Yix-q8mf-qw@mail.gmail.com>
Milton, Owen: I agree we need a plan that identifies AIKR deliverables. Building on the momentum created by the awareness work , I propose we use the STRATML created for the eGovernance as our startpoint. Specifically, we should use the STRAML template to create a new AIKR plan and then connect it to the eGovenance STRATML subplan. Acknowledging that our current chair is overloaded with commitments , I also propose that we (1) confirm that we should continue as a CG and (2) elect at least two members into leadership positions. Carl Mattocks It was a pleasure to clarify On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 10:43 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > Milton, while much of the content of your proposed report is beyond my > scope of knowledge and expertise, I volunteer to render in StratML format: > > a) your outline for deliverables, as your plan, and > > b) any set of recommendations for research and standardization that > may gain consensus in the CG, as the CG's proposed plan. > > If one exists, I'd also like to render your research institute's plan in > StratML format, particularly if it differs from a and b, above. > > BTW, this exchange prompted me to recall the proposal Denise Bedford and I > co-authored in 2013 to specify a Human Reference Model: > http://ambur.net/HRMProposal.pdf > > It appears MS is planning to address parts of that puzzle, in a > proprietary manner, in Project Cortex: > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/MSPCwStyle.xml The name they've chosen is > of special interest to me in light of its relationship to this article I > published nearly two years ago: > https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-only-had-brain-evolving-prefrontal-core-text-internet-owen-ambur/ > > Owen > On 11/24/2019 10:10 PM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote: > > Dear all, > > I myself, like you Paola and I must assume most of the members of this > Community Group would like to see a report written. > > Personally I am intent on getting some proposals for creation of standards > off the ground as well. > > I will look at what we have produced so far, and what we realistically can > produce in the next three months. > > I am in the process of setting up an applied research institute in which > AI will be a central theme. > > I will create an outline for deliverables, a wiki, and creating an > extensive literature review, and listing of existing institutes, global > programs and projects and a listing of existing standards relevant to AI, > KR, robotics and related subjects. > > All of this structured into a document with an introduction, history of > the subject, brief overview of current state of the art, guidelines > proposed by the UN, European Union etc,, and a set of our CG > recommendations for research and standardization, rounded off with an > extensive literature review and listings and directories could serve as the > initial deliverable. > > This document could then serve as a focus for further discussion in an IG > or production of new deliverables in a continued AIKR CG. > > Creating this deliverable will take 3 months, and because I have to > produce a similar deliverable for my research institute, in less than 3 > months, I take it upon myself to get this deliverable produced with > collaboration from members of this CG. > > Volunteers for support and collaboration, comments, suggestions and ideas > are welcome. > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to > all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied > mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development > > > On Friday, November 22, 2019, 10:34:07 PM AST, Paola Di Maio > <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Greetings folks > > according to Ian at W3C, the main difference between between a CG and an > IG is > > *Community Groups often produce specifications (called > Community Group Reports). Interest Groups typically do not; they focus on > discussion. * > > I hope this group can produce a report, but because we have not seen > enough contributions > since the group started, and I am really busy working on research papers > and talks, and I am going to be for the next few months despite my wish to > produce something for this group I am struggling to keep up, I wonder if we > should > a) wait until someone perks up to contribute to write a group report, > b) change this group to an interest group at some point soon > > Thoughts? Objections? > *Have a great weekend* > > > *PDM * > > > >
Received on Monday, 25 November 2019 14:56:44 UTC