Re: Updates, roadmap and open tasks

Thank you Dave
(to list reply to an offlist reply)
Yes, the puzzle is big, the more one explores  the more its easy to get
lost but
maybe if we come to, hopefully we can gather useful insights and produce
something
useful, even just at conceptual level or some thought experiment
PDM

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 10:49 PM Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

> And don’t forget the emerging opportunities for combining graph data and
> rules with statistical techniques for a  new brand of AI. It’s a shame that
> research is so compartmentalised these days as there is so much to learn
> from each other, in this case from cognitive psychology.  The puzzle I am
> most interested in is how to model feelings and emotions, something so
> essential to being human, and to understanding humans.
>
> On 25 May 2019, at 13:17, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All
>
> For your reference, I have created an editable roadmap
> (still very notional at the moment but feel free to edit)  here
> <https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1tTzzABuyxSgcnquGWezgwqsXdC-fUDWnes3l9EMs29o/edit?usp=sharing>
>
> I was pleasantly surprised to learn that despite trends that say that
> knowledge based systems have lost ground and that people are using NN and
> ML for their robots
> knowledge based systems are still used especially where heuristics
> decisions are applied
> Here an example
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ianzvu7BR9U
>
>
> You may like to know that since starting this group, our mission has
> inspired others
> to explore similar lines involving AI KR here a couple of examples.
>
>
> https://www.journals.elsevier.com/artificial-intelligence/call-for-papers/special-issue-on-explainable-artificial-intelligence
>
>  Workshops - IJCAI-19 – August 10-16 2019, Macao, China
> <https://www.ijcai19.org/workshops.html>
> https://www.ijcai19.org/workshops.html
>
> and a few more related initiatives have sprung up
>
> I am currently writing a guest editorial for the forthcoming special issue
> AI KR, as well as a guest lecture based on the same materials. As already
> mentioned,  initially I d like to pin down a set of key terms from AI KR
> literature in particular in relation to the web.onllne systems, but get
> lost in the process, its a very big field * but learning a lot
>
> Will share soon my initial selection- and would very much welcome everyone
> to do the same
> I have not yet been able to decide how many terms we should identify, and
> with which criteria to select those terms, but roughly they should
> represent with natural language (English) the AI KR domain . Not easy, feel
> free to advise
>
> We have now obtained copies of two standards (Tahdah!!) I mentioned in the
> slides I shared earlier this year (power of unity presentation for IEEE
> P7000)
> BS 8611:2016
> ISO  13482
>
> I  didnt know that ISO 13482 is also a BS standard, in fact the document
> is called
> BS 13482 ISO, rather confusing isnt it?
> I am facing several dilemmas, in particular that some of these standards
> address autonomous systems and robotics, rather than AI (which in my view
> is a more abstract term) which is also one of the challenges this group
> should aim to tackle imho'
>
> Finally, after some discussions, I conclude that this group should explore
> the relevance of AIKR work to other W3C groups, in the hope that some of
> what we may come up with eventually can also help them solve some problems
> (many issues are related to AI KR challenges at the mo)
>
> Please feel free to help with the above or to put your own work in the
> roadmap for this cg
>
> If I dont hear of preferences for TPAC meeting slots, I ll chose one which
> is convenient for me and hope at a minimum to explore the relevance of this
> groups work with other groups
>
> Best regards
>
> PDM
>
>
> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
> W3C Data Activity Lead & W3C champion for the Web of things
>
>
>
>
>
>
>