- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:57:00 +0800
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>, Brian Nosek <nosek@virginia.edu>, Alan Yates <alan@docugami.com>, Chris Pardo <Pardo@justtagit.io>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SqyLuvhpVQmoZ1EBV0qsue_MaNX-xAYhVvCThTmTo0HMg@mail.gmail.com>
Own thank you, since the suggestion in the postulate may take foot, better pin it to a citable resource since you ve been spoiling us, wonder if it would be possible to render as stratml the postulate itself? *cannot remember what you said about a stratml generator that would allow me to do so re the interplanetary file format, we ll definitely need it P On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:49 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > To the degree that I understand it, Paola, I agree with your postulate. > To me, it means the objectives of AI agents should be documented and shared > in an open, standard, human- and machine-readable format like StratML. > > In any event, Figshare's about statement is now available in StratML > format at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#FGSHR > > I look forward to learning if they have any plans to: > > a) help make research outputs machine-readable > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document> and/or > > b) partner with other organizations pursuing common or complementary > objectives, e.g., the Center for Open Science. > http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#COS > > BTW, IDF's about statement is now also in the StratML collection, at > http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IDF I look forward to learning how > DOIs might relate to stratml:Identifier(s), which are generally but not > necessarily GUIDs. > > The InterPlanetary File System also comes to mind. > http://stratml.us/carmel/iso/IPFSwStyle.xml > > Owen > On 8/25/2019 10:26 PM, Paola Di Maio wrote: > > Since posting discussions about bridging the gap between symbolic and > subsymbolic, (see related posts) I have formulated a simple postulate, and > assigned a DOI so that anone following up on these discussions can cite the > contribution accordingly. I ll be happy to review the postulate with > comments and suggestions if any > > To support AI explainability, learnability,verifiability and > reproducibility, it is postulated that > for each MLA *machine learning algorithm, > there should correspond a natural language expression or other type of > symbolic knowledge representation > > https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9730268.v2 > > https://figshare.com/articles/A_New_Postulate_for_Knowledge_Representation_in_AI/9730268 > > >
Received on Monday, 26 August 2019 03:58:01 UTC