- From: Tymofii Pidlisnyi <tima@aeoess.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 10:33:16 -0600
- To: zhaoxinghua07@126.com
- Cc: public-agentprotocol@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAH0g2++281qsGrfe6a-V88NFdrbdseYDjD-Fi22nQQSFs_RLPA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Steven, Keep the two vectors in #216, separate from #206. Please address the source references requested in my review before merging. I'll review the revised head once you push it. Best, Tymofii On Wed, Nov 04, 2026 02:47 AM, Xinghua Zhao <zhaoxinghua07@126.com> wrote: > Hi Tymofii, > > Thank you for the correction — agreed on all points: #210/#212 are Lee's > RTTP/IQA addressing vectors; the NTI-relevant candidates are #206 (and #216 > pending your review). The author-produced run framing is also clear: the > run record will carry reproducible commands and per-case output, labeled > author-produced, and the lab's role is recording evidence, not > certification. > > My two candidate vectors (unsigned capability token -> Deny; unmet quorum > -> Blocked) are already packaged per CONTRIBUTING.md (CANDIDATE.md, > vectors.json, check.py, mutate.py), pin whichever text the CG settles on, > and currently report 8/8 agree with 6/6 mutants killed. Happy to submit > them into the suite once #216 review settles — tell me if you'd rather have > them folded into #206 or kept as the separate #216 submission. > > Disclosure: prepared with AI assistance, reviewed and approved by me > before sending. > > Best, > Xinghua Zhao (Steven Zhao) > ORCID 0009-0001-0512-1237
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2026 16:33:22 UTC