- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:33:16 +0000
- To: public-act-r@w3.org
On 28/11/2019 10:11, Wilco Fiers wrote: > Hey folks, > Here are the minutes from today's meeting: > https://www.w3.org/2019/11/28-act-r-minutes.html Oh, I had best intentions of joining the call for the first time today, but missed that it was in the morning rather than in the afternoon (UK time). One aspect that I wanted to maybe very broadly touch on is the idea of unambiguous applicability and expectations ... because as much as WCAG tried to be objective, there are many instances where it really comes down to subjectivity (to determine if a text alternative conveys the same purpose ... who can objectively say what the purpose is in all situations? or headings/labels being descriptive ... that's also subjective to an extent). While I think it's a laudable goal to always be unambiguous (assuming it's meant as "objective"), I'd question if that's always possible. Thoughts? P (also, is it best to raise this as an issue in GitHub, or is it ok to discuss things on mailing list as well) -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2019 10:33:19 UTC