- From: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 22:55:54 +0000
- To: Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>
- CC: "public-a11y-discov-vocab@w3.org" <public-a11y-discov-vocab@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <30EEBF2E-0CDB-4E2B-A361-F3468E1C95DF@benetech.org>
Hi George, I don’t think we can eliminate combinations, but having these as clearly separate sets is something we should encourage IE. * [textual] * [textual, visual] Instead of having them all on some single line, where it would be confusing I agree Thanks Charles EOM Charles LaPierre Principal, Accessibility Standards, and Technical Lead, Global Certified Accessible Benetech Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y On May 25, 2022, at 2:07 PM, kerscher@montana.com<mailto:kerscher@montana.com> wrote: Hello, Might we eliminate confusion by eliminating the comma separated option? Textual, visual is too close to textual visual, and it means something completely different. By having them as separate entries, we might reduce confusion. Best George <image001.png> George Kerscher Ph.D. -In our Information Age, access to information is a fundamental human right. Chief Innovations Officer, DAISY Consortium http://www.daisy.org<http://www.daisy.org/> Senior Advisor, Global Literacy, Benetech http://www.benetech.org<http://www.benetech.org/> President, International Digital Publishing Forum (IDPF) http://www.idpf.org<http://www.idpf.org/> Member of the National Museum and Library Services Board (IMLS) http://www.imls.gov<http://www.imls.gov/> Chair Steering Council Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), at W3C http://www.w3.org/WAI Phone: +1 406/549-4687 Cell:+1 406/544-2466 Email: kerscher@montana.com<mailto:kerscher@montana.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2022 22:56:11 UTC