- From: <richard.hill@itu.int>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 09:53:46 +0200
- To: duerst@w3.org, amy@w3.org, pso-pc@w3.org
In my personal opinion, there is no need for another PSO GA, but I would not oppose one being held if there is support for another one. Best, Richard ----------------------------------------- Richard Hill Counsellor, ITU-T SG2 International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland tel: +41 22 730 5887 FAX: +41 22 730 5853 Email: richard.hill@itu.int Study Group 2 email: tsbsg2@itu.int > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org] > Sent: Saturday, 12 October 2002 3:55 > To: Amy van der Hiel; pso-pc@w3.org > Subject: Location/date of next PSO GA > > > > At 14:07 02/10/11 -0400, Amy van der Hiel wrote: > > >Draft agenda (updated): > > >5. Location/date next PSO GA -- proposed by Martin Duerst > > Here is some background so that I don't have to explain > everything during the teleconference: > > Being responsible for the PSO Secretariat this year, > according to the MOU, W3C also has to organize the > PSO General Assembly. Based on this, and the current > ICANN reorganization, we are currently looking at > three options: > > 1) Organize the GA in connection with our Technical > Plenary meeting in Boston on or around Wednesday, > 5 March 2003. > > 2) Organize the GA in connection with our Advisory > Committee meeting in Budapest around 18-20 May 2003. > The World Wide Web Conference is also held the same > week in Budapest. > > 3) Decide that because the PSO is being turned down, > there is no need to hold another GA. > > We would like to get your preliminary input on this > topic. > > Regards, Martin. > > >
Received on Monday, 14 October 2002 03:54:29 UTC