Dear Mr. Brannon, On behalf of the PSO Protocol Council I have to inform you on the following: PSO Protocol Council discussed ISO application for SDO membership of the PSO Please find below the positions of different PSO signatories and the decision taken: ETSI Representatives fully supported ISO application and stated that they do not see anything that may prevent ISO from joining PSO-PC. ETSI considers that ISO is fully qualified as an SDO in terms of existing MOU and ETSI is in favour of inclusion of ISO as a member of PSO. ITU-T Representatives welcomed ISO application. ITU also believes that ISO fulfills the necessary requirements. IETF Representatives opposed to the ISO application. IETF representatives referred to the Section 8 b (i) of MOU: "...In order for an organization to become a party to this MOU, all then-existing MOU signatories must agree that such an organization qualifies as an SDO..." and further explained that as the PSO is evidently being wound up by the Board of ICANN, it would be unfair for ISO and PSO to admit ISO at this point in time. W3C Representative supported the position of IETF. As Protocol Council is a consensus-based body, and a consensus could not be reached on this issue, the conclusion made is that ISO can not be admitted into PSO at this point in time. Protocol Council Members noted that if ISO wishes it may apply to ICANN under the terms of the MOU Section 8 (b) (ii), which says that: "...Rejected applicants may appeal to the ICANN Board, which may override such a rejection if the ICANN Board finds, by at least two-thirds vote, that the organization meets the SDO criteria set forth above..." Sincerely yours, Vladimir Androuchko PSO-PC Secretary August 2001-August 2002