W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-tls@w3.org > January to March 1997

Re: TWO WEEK LAST CALL: Regularizing Port Numbers for SSL.

From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 09:31:04 -0800
Message-ID: <32F8C3D8.4DAA@netscape.com>
To: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
CC: ietf-tls@w3.org
Rodney Thayer wrote:
> 
> I disagree that it's easy to SSL-ize applications. I added SSL to <a
> commercial browser> and it was massively painful because of the
> message negotiation that has to happen up front; this interfered
> unfortunately with the non-blocking I/O model the browser was using.
> 
> Of course, now that I have the scars from this experience I feel I
> understand exactly what I need to do next time I design an
> application...

I agree, it's harder than it looks.  Especially for applications that
have to handle several open streams simultaneously.

I also object to trying to do SSL and non-SSL on the same port for
security reasons.  It adds another level of complexity to making sure
you don't get rolled back to an insecure state.

-- 
You should only break rules of style if you can    | Tom Weinstein
coherently explain what you gain by so doing.      | tomw@netscape.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 1997 12:30:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:17:12 UTC