- From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 07:30:56 -0500
- To: ietf-tls@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I think we need to decide what we number this thing. I think this was and will continue to be a point of confusion so I think it needs to be resolved. Here's how I think it should be resolved. Right now, the document calls itself 1.0, and the protocol it specifies is 3.0. SSL also is called 3.0, if you look at the bits on the wire. We have rough consensus that the modifications we are making will be 'minor', but I believe at least one of them (the MAC change) will cause this protocol to no longer exactly match "SSL 3.0". QUESTIONS: 1. Am I correct the MAC changes will cause this to cease to match SSL 3.0 exactly? 2. What do we call it? I have a suggestion. I suggest we make the label of the document and the internal version match. Furthermore, since we are making a significant change to a field in the TLS Record Format (TLSCiphertext MAC values will be calculated differently so an SSL 3.0 MAC will not match, right?) I suggest it's not a 'minor' revision but rather a 'major' revision. THEREFORE... I suggest we call both the SPEC and the PROTOCOL "TLS 4.0". Comments? Corrections? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.0 Business Edition Comment: PGP by ViaCrypt iQCVAgUBMq2B+sKmlvJNktGxAQFCxQP/cBzsUxAwB04Rc2rqLbK+JSmzZsXcqOmS PvSy+lbDqk6P2sbIOm25njO6ffwOtApcLqFLpJxURolewTsl1bdI/Za6MIsiDmQl sb/JPewYR/FecOaUGCmyfs3XQU37jmGFJrcZUFh+MoiDa0l8nKdz8EjqGBFPQxEB UAbWBKIWE7U= =T+v9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com> +1 617 332 7292 Sable Technology Corp, 246 Walnut St., Newton MA 02160 USA Fax: +1 617 332 7970 http://www.shore.net/~sable "Developers of communications software"
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 1996 10:37:55 UTC