- From: <LANGFORD_SUSAN@tandem.com>
- Date: 8 May 96 17:21:00 +1700
- To: maracchini_dave@tandem.com, ietf-tls@w3.org
> From: Dan Simon <dansimon@microsoft.com> > > (I'll make another pitch > here for not explicitly specifying the hash function or functions used > in the "handshake hash"; if this news about MD5 had come out a year > later, then the body of the spec itself would have had to be revised, > instead of just the list of valid hash functions). Absolutely. Explicitly specifying the handshake hash functions in SSL is a weakness of the protocol, not a feature. Regarding the meeting in the Bay Area at the end of the month, someone from Atalla will certainly be there. (Probably myself and Dave Maracchini.) Susan Langford Sr. Cryptographic Analyst, Atalla langford_susan@tandem.com
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 1996 20:23:11 UTC