- From: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@consensus.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 18:31:32 -0700
- To: ietf-tls@w3.org
Does the scope of the TLS working group include interaction with firewalls and/or proxy servers? I think it should, as I think it will be difficult to have a generic (i.e. non-protocol based) solution to this problem. If scope includes this, it should be reflected in the draft charter. I suggest adding the following language in the change bars be added to the following paragraph of the draft: At 11:30 PM 4/5/96, Win Treese wrote: >Several methods of providing a secure and authenticated channel >between a client and a server on the Internet above the TCP layer have >appeared. The objective of this proposed working group is to write >standards track RFC(s) for protocols using the currently available >Internet drafts as a basis. The SSL, PCT and SSH protocols are >examples of mechanisms of establishing a secure channel for general >purpose or special purpose Internet applications running over a |reliable transport, usually TCP. In addition, this proposed working |group will address methods of providing secure channels through |firewalls, proxy servers or other reasonable intermediaries in the |connection. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ..Christopher Allen Consensus Development Corporation.. ..<ChristopherA@consensus.com> 1563 Solano Avenue #355.. .. Berkeley, CA 94707-2116.. ..<http://www.consensus.com/> o510/559-1500 f510/559-1505..
Received on Monday, 8 April 1996 21:43:45 UTC