- From: <marobertson@dstsystems.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:33:54 -0500
- To: ietf-swap@w3.org
Marc A. Robertson@DST 10/15/98 08:33 AM I need some help understanding this. I was under the impression that SWAP was intended to be a workflow server to workflow server protocol, like interface 4 in the WfMC reference model. However, at least some of the arguments in favor of synchronous processing( keith swenson's, for example ) imply a workflow client to workflow server protocol, like interface 2 in the WfMC reference model. Which is it? Or, is it intended to be used in both roles? If it is to be server to server, then I would say that async is all that is required, and would be simpler to implement. If it is to be client to server, then sync is probably required to get the kind of interaction desired in that environment Marc Robertson Staff Consultant DST Systems, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 15 October 1998 09:29:38 UTC