- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 17:38:33 PST
- To: "Richard Heim" <rheim@crusher.jcals.csc.com>, "SWAP LIST" <ietf-swap@w3.org>
> Am I to understand that the idea of placing these methods into the > header is NOT settled - and that I can implement this NOW any way I want? Until there is a standard, there is no standard. You can always implement things NOW however you want. The only question is whether you will find the resulting interoperability satisfactory. Has anyone reported the minutes from the SWAP meeting at the last IETF? I couldn't make it (a conflict with another WG which I couldn't miss), but the report I heard didn't make it sound like good news. > I'd hate to write it one way now just to change it later - but I > need to get something going now! The price of early adoption is the likelihood of having to change things. Larry
Received on Monday, 14 December 1998 20:39:03 UTC