- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:19:52 +1100
- To: Julien Cayzac <julien@cayzac.name>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hello Julien, > On 29 Nov 2025, at 7:54 pm, Julien Cayzac <julien@cayzac.name> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to submit a proposal to this working group (I think?), but I have a few questions. > > * Are this HTTP WG and the HTTPbis WG the same working group? They are. > * I was under the impression my draft had to be in XML in order to submit it to https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/, but looking at https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions, it seems you are using a Markdown variant as the source. Is there a tool that turns the .md into an .xml suitable for the datatracker? Yes - see: https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc > * Should I just use the template repository and not pay attention to what happens in the github workflow? Many people use this: https://github.com/martinthomson/i-d-template ... which incorporates kramdown-rfc. > * Since my proposal is for http-extensions, should I submit a PR on GitHub with the new .md files, or should I submit to the datatracker first? It needs to be adopted by the group before getting into http-extensions, so doing it in your own repository and submitting to the datatracker is the right way to do this. Cheers, > > Thank you, > Julien. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2025 06:20:03 UTC