- From: Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 04:57:50 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, mnot@mnot.net, mnot@mnot.net
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this document and I have no concerns from transport protocol point of view. This is an informational document updating another informational document. I am assuming that zstd has been deployed and used to that extend that the update was essential. does that also indicate that the "informational" may not be any more the accurate category for this? Has this been considered?
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 11:57:55 UTC