Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary-11: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for writing this (and helping me understand it :-))

I have two comments:

1: I found:
"4.  If PATTERN has regexp groups then return FALSE."
confusing -- I initially understood this to be regex capturing groups (e.g "I
like cheese" -> /.*(c.*se)/ captures 'cheese'). After discussions with Patrick
I see that this is actually
https://urlpattern.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-urlpattern-hasregexpgroups ...

2: I also found the number of 'dictionary's in "The "match" value is required
and MUST be included in the Use-As-Dictionary Dictionary for the dictionary to
be considered valid." hard to parse, and I couldn't figure out if the second
"Dictionary" should actually have been "dictionary" (is it a
[STRUCTURED-FIELDS] term or just a word :-))

Received on Thursday, 15 August 2024 20:38:15 UTC