- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:32:11 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 16.07.2024 03:26, Michael Toomim wrote: > Hi everyone in HTTP! > > Last fall we solicited feedback on the Braid State Synchronization > proposal [draft > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-toomim-httpbis-braid-http-04>, slides <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/118/materials/slides-118-httpbis-braid-http-add-synchronization-to-http-00>], which I'd summarize as: > > "We're enthusiastic about the general work, but the proposal is too > high-level. Break the spec up into multiple independent specs, and > work bottom-up. Focus on concrete 'bits-on-the-wire'." > > So I'm breaking the spec up, and have drafted up the first chunk for > you. I would very much like your review on: > > *Versioning of HTTP Resources* > draft-toomim-httpbis-versions > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00 > ... I believe it would be good to work out the differences to RFC 3253 (https://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc3253.html); even if only in a short paragraph. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 27 July 2024 08:32:17 UTC