Ah, I see the other proposal now; will incorporate. > On 28 Feb 2023, at 5:37 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 28.02.2023 07:13, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> I've updated the PR: >> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/2404/files >> >> We can't place a RFC2119 requirement on other documents; it will get dinged by the IESG/RFC Editor. 2119 is for implementations only. > > Yes. Did I propose that? > > Best regards, Julian > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2023 06:39:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 28 February 2023 06:39:32 UTC