Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)

On 28.02.2023 07:13, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I've updated the PR:
> We can't place a RFC2119 requirement on other documents; it will get dinged by the IESG/RFC Editor. 2119 is for implementations only.

Yes. Did I propose that?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2023 06:37:21 UTC