W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2023

Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 07:37:03 +0100
Message-ID: <39eb8bc4-20da-ab7f-64ec-6dab85bd4b0a@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

On 28.02.2023 07:13, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> I've updated the PR:
>    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/2404/files
>
> We can't place a RFC2119 requirement on other documents; it will get dinged by the IESG/RFC Editor. 2119 is for implementations only.

Yes. Did I propose that?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2023 06:37:21 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)"
Previous message: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)"
In reply to: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)"
Next in thread: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)"
Reply: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)"
Reply: Mark Nottingham: "Re: Structured Fields: strict error handling (#2399)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 28 February 2023 06:37:22 UTC