- From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:53:31 -0800
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, mnot@mnot.net
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-origin-h3/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The shepherd writeup doesn't say why Proposed Standard is the right status here. It's fairly obvious, but it would be great to have a complete answer on the record. I suggest changing "OPTIONAL" to "optional" and dropping the use of RFC 2119/8174, which isn't really necessary for this simple document.
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2023 00:53:44 UTC