The web+ URI scheme prefix

BCP 190/RFC 8820 states: A Specification that defines substructure for 
URI schemes overall (e.g., a prefix or suffix for URI scheme names) MUST 
do so by modifying [BCP35] (an exceptional circumstance).

However, it never mentions the "web+" prefix, which has been in use by 
web browsers for over a decade, and neither does BCP35. This seems like 
something worth discussing. Is this an appropriate venue for such 
discussion?

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2023 00:10:57 UTC