Please do this work, we have an awkward gap right now. If we keep the scope narrow, I'm confident that the draft can progress quickly. I recently contributed support for H2 ORIGIN frame to wireshark [1]. I'll happily do the same for H3. Cheers Lucas [1] https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/5892 On Thu, 2 Jun 2022, 18:40 David Schinazi, <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > I support adoption. > Since we decided that all h2 frames needed to be re-registered for h3, it > makes sense to have a low bar for drafts like this. > > David > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:02 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > >> Apologies to Mike for letting this languish for so long. >> >> Right now it looks like we have support (although a bit weak) for >> adoption. If anyone has something else to say, please do so; otherwise >> we'll consider it adopted and get Mike to spin a -00 WG draft next week. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> > On 11 Jan 2022, at 4:40 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> > >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > At our last interim, we discussed adopting this document: >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3/ >> > ... and there seemed to be support for doing so. >> > >> > This message is a call for adoption of this document. Please state >> whether you support WG adoption of this draft. >> > >> > The CfA will end in one week. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > -- >> > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2022 17:57:06 UTC