Re: Call for Adoption: draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3-00

I support adoption.
Since we decided that all h2 frames needed to be re-registered for h3, it
makes sense to have a low bar for drafts like this.

David

On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 10:02 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Apologies to Mike for letting this languish for so long.
>
> Right now it looks like we have support (although a bit weak) for
> adoption. If anyone has something else to say, please do so; otherwise
> we'll consider it adopted and get Mike to spin a -00 WG draft next week.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 11 Jan 2022, at 4:40 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > At our last interim, we discussed adopting this document:
> >  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bishop-httpbis-origin-h3/
> > ... and there seemed to be support for doing so.
> >
> > This message is a call for adoption of this document. Please state
> whether you support WG adoption of this draft.
> >
> > The CfA will end in one week.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>