W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2022

Re: ABNF and Structured fields

From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:11:29 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9ob0GyJpcWBa1wn9HdkLU5EqYGqi-a+BiyNnN0P5YhGxgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hey Roberto,

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022, 07:27 Roberto Polli, <robipolli@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
> Which is the best way to describe structured fields? While there was a
> discussion on removing ABNF, I saw that in priorities there is still a
> reference to it.
> Is it fine then to use ABNF when describing SF?

We've been working on addressing this question in the HTTP style guide [1].

The style change were applied in the Priorities draft as part of AUTH48.
The following PR was merged into the branch with all AUTH48 changes, we
just won't see that as a rendered output until the RFC is published


I can work on an equivalent update PR to the Digest spec to align it to the
HTTP style guide.


[1] - https://httpwg.org/admin/editors/style-guide

Received on Friday, 29 April 2022 07:11:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:07 UTC