Re: Draft for Resumable Uploads

On 2022-04-06 07:17, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> On 6 Apr 2022, at 5:22 am, Guoye Zhang <> wrote:
>> I was exaggerating a bit, but I have no idea how to PATCH a resource after reading RFC5789, it just introduces a general concept and leaves nearly everything open to implementations. That’s why I believe we need further standards for any concrete use.
> PATCH intentionally leaves everything up to the media type of the PATCH request, not the implementation. With hindsight, at least one or two well-defined PATCH media types should have been defined at the same time as 5789 - their absence (especially JSON's) created a lot of confusion.

Has that confusion now cleared, or is there a way to clear it?

Regards,   Martin.

> Cheers,
> --
> Mark Nottingham

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2022 23:05:06 UTC