- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:50:30 +1100
- To: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Not to my knowledge. Cheers, > On 14 Dec 2021, at 12:56 pm, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote: > > Hi Mark, Roy, > > This document is now on version 11 (you reviewed 10): > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-11 > > This is on Thursday's telechat. Does the HTTP Field registration need to be re-reviewed? > > thanks, > > Amanda Baber > IANA Operations Manager > > On Tue Nov 30 00:05:58 2021, mnot@mnot.net wrote: >> That's fine, thanks. >> >> >>> On 30 Nov 2021, at 5:23 am, Michelle Cotton via RT <drafts-expert- >>> review-comment@iana.org> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Mark and Roy, >>> (cc to the httpbis WG) >>> >>> As the designated experts for the HTTP Fields registry, can you >>> review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-09 >>> for us? >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority/ >>> >>> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, >>> we'll make the registration at >>> >>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-fields >>> >>> The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration >>> reviews. The due date for this request is 13 December 2021. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Michelle Cotton >>> IANA Services >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2021 05:50:52 UTC