- From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:30:51 +1100
- To: "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>, michelle.cotton@icann.org
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
It's still good. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, at 13:15, Amanda Baber via RT wrote: > Hi Martin, > > This document is now on version 11 (you reviewed 10): > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority > > This is on Thursday's IESG telechat. Does the HTTP/2 Settings > registration need to be re-reviewed? > > thanks, > > Amanda Baber > IANA Operations Manager > > On Mon Nov 29 21:53:31 2021, mt@lowentropy.net wrote: >> Hi Amanda, >> >> These registrations are OK. (I only formally approve the setting here, >> of course.) >> >> Cheers, >> Martin >> >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, at 05:27, Michelle Cotton via RT wrote: >> > Dear Martin, >> > (cc to the httpbis WG) >> > >> > As the primary designated expert for the HTTP/2 Settings registry, >> > can >> > you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-httpbis-priority- >> > 09 >> > for us? >> > >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-priority/ >> > >> > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, >> > we'll make the registration at >> > >> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/http2-parameters/ >> > >> > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration >> > reviews. The due date for this request is 13 December 2021. >> > >> > Thank you, >> > >> > Michelle Cotton >> > IANA Services
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2021 03:31:24 UTC