- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 11:12:39 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- Mark Nottingham writes: > FYI. > > This was previously hidden in the binary structured fields draft, but it > seems potentially useful for other purposes -- e.g., exposing more > fields in a structure-oriented API for HTTP (e.g., Fetch), > canonicalising fields (e.g., for Signatures), etc. I have been wondering when you were going to drag that out in the open :-) Yes, I absolutely think we should do this, because this was pretty much precisely why (and how!) I came up with SF to begin with. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2021 11:12:58 UTC